[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
Fwd: [LiteracyForAll] attachments
- To: CA Resisters <ca-resisters@interversity.org>
- Subject: Fwd: [LiteracyForAll] attachments
- From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 22:36:57 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=nMDlaMjIsb1GfPW4j23aZI30u7NEEzhPfTuIV6aflw0ZjY177Y8pef4B7UPpXxIB; h=Received:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Begin forwarded message:
From: "GERALD BRACEY" <gbracey1@verizon.net>
Date: Tue Apr 1, 2008 5:22:07 PM US/Pacific
To: <arn-l@interversity.org>, <LiteracyForAll@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [LiteracyForAll] attachments
Reply-To: LiteracyForAll@yahoogroups.com
We've had painters in the house the last 4 days and maybe I'm
suffering from the fumes. I know that LFA and ARN don't take
attachments, but sent one anyway. Here's the same material as a text
file. Please note the recommended reading at the end.
JB
-------------------------
WE’RE A NATION AT RISK (HAPPRY APRIL FOOL’S DAY)
“A Nation at Risk” should have been published on April 1, 1983. It
was a great April Fools Day joke on America (Given what it did to
public education, though, educators can be forgiven if they smile
not). Instead, the National Commission on Excellence in Education
published it on April 28, meaning we “celebrate” its 25th anniversary
later this month. Most commentators thought it raised a great alarm
with its stentorian rhetoric about “a rising tide of mediocrity” and
cold warrior comment that “if an unfriendly foreign power had
attempted to impose on America the mediocre performance that exists
today, we might well have considered it an act of war.” Whew.
New York Times columnist/humorist, Russell Baker, looked at the
commissioners’ rhetoric, which he said would not pass muster in a 10th
grade essay and declared, “I’m giving them an A+ in mediocrity.”
Baker’s quip had no impact as we have faced, and continue to face, a
rising tide of reform reports and school bashing.
Interestingly, conservatives criticized the report or rejected it.
Joseph Kraft excoriated his fellow conservatives for reacting to the
report as they always did to other liberal activities: blasting the
liberals without offering anything positive. Bill Buckley chided the
commission for offering reforms “that you and I would come up with
over the phone.” And George Will lamented the lack of emphasis on
history.
In fact, ANAR is a golden treasury of selected, spun, and distorted
statistics which ANAR said were indicators of the risk—all of which
were cast in terms of test scores. (ANAR fixed on this nation the
idea that tests are all you need to evaluate schools and the idea as
well that high test scores inevitably lead to economic growth). For
example, “there was a steady decline in science achievement scores of
U. S. 17-year-olds as measured by national assessments in 1969, 1973
and 1997.” This was true. But if one asked why the commission picked
on science and 17-year-olds, curious facts emerged to answer the
question. That steady decline in science isn’t there for 9- and
13-year-olds, the other two ages tested. It’s not there for any age
in reading. It’s not there for any age in math. The commission had 9
trend lines (3 subjects by 3 ages). Only one could be used to support
crisis rhetoric. That was the only one to appear in the report.
Or, consider this: “Average achievement of high school students on
most standardized tests is now lower than 26 years ago when Sputnik
was launched.” This is a most curious statement because at the time,
only two achievement tests, the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (grades
3-8) and the Iowa Tests of Educational Development (grades 9-12) had
fixed standards that permitted analysis of trends over time (NAEP did
not exist until 1969).
If one looks at the trends for the ITBS or ITED one sees a similar
pattern for all grades: a decline for about a decade, roughly 1965 to
1975 (the onset various a bit by grade) and then a rise to record high
levels (no media considered this news).
Now consider the events of that decade. It opened with the Watts
riots in L. A. and these were followed by urban violence all across
the nation. It was the decade of the Black Panthers, Symbionese
Liberation Army, Students for a Democratic Society, and the Free
Speech Movement which led to sit-ins at many universities. It
contained the Summer of Love, Woodstock and Altamont. Many people
took up the recreational use of mind-altering drugs and Ken Kesey led
his LSD-laced Merry Pranksters into many outrageous situations (see
Tom Wolfe, The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test). The Kent State
atrocities and the Chicago Police Riot both occurred in this decade
In those ten years, the literature contained many anti-Establishment
tracts such as The Making of a Counter Culture, The Greening of
America, and The Pursuit of Loneliness. Books limited to schools
included Death at an Early Age, The Way It Spozed to Be, 36 Children,
Free Schools, Deschooling Society, and Teaching as a Subversive
Activity.
Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and Robert Kennedy were all
assassinated. The nation became obsessed and then depressed over
first the Vietnam War and then Watergate.
Little wonder that a saying later emerged: If you remember the
Sixties, you weren’t there. It would have been an effing miracle if
test scores had not fallen.
There is a decent set of retrospectives on ANAR in the April Phi Delta
Kappan. My take on the report appeared in Kappan’s April 2003 issue,
“April Foolishness.” Better than the look-backs are three articles on
education for a democracy, articles which emphasize concepts like
cooperation, community, renewal, fulfillment, civic work, tolerance,
commitment, and other words I feared had disappeared from the English
language in this country. I highly recommend this trio of essays.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LiteracyForAll/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LiteracyForAll/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:LiteracyForAll-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:LiteracyForAll-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LiteracyForAll-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Vote in the National Cheney Impeachment Poll
http://www.usalone.com/blogvoices.php?Cheney%20Impeachment%3F
Add this text to your own email and blog signatures!
Post a Message to ca-resisters:
|