[ Author Prev][ Author Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Author Index][ Thread Index]
Alfie Kohn Victory for Education
- To: arn-l@interversity.org
- Subject: Alfie Kohn Victory for Education
- From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:35:03 -0700
A victory for education
By Adrian Walker, Globe Columnist | August 7, 2006
Boston Globe
Alfie Kohn isn't expecting a check in the mail,
or a bouquet from the people who run the Massachusetts Department of Education.
Nevertheless, victory was sweet last week for
the prolific education author. Superior Court
Judge Hiller B. Zobel ruled last week that the
DOE violated Kohn's civil rights by blocking him
from speaking at an education conference in 2001.
Kohn had been booked to speak on standardized
testing. The department, which had funded the
conference, threatened to withdraw its money if Kohn was allowed to speak.
Kohn's offense was that he is an outspoken
opponent of high-stakes testing generally, and
of the MCAS specifically. Public support for the
exam was wobbly five years ago, which might
explain why it was so important to keep him away
from a microphone. Though uninvited from the
conference, Kohn was paid his $5,000 fee --
paid, in effect, not to speak. The American
Civil Liberties Union sued the department on
behalf of Kohn and some of the conference
organizers who had invited him. The suit ``was
never about my honorarium, it was about the
First Amendment," Kohn said yesterday. ``The
judge is now going to craft an injunction which
specifies exactly what the Department of
Education must do or can't do in the future, as
a result of having been liable for trying to silence dissent."
Kohn made it clear that his opinion of tests
such as the MCAS has not changed one bit in the
past five years. He argues that such tests
short-circuit real teaching and learning.
``It remains a test that measures what matters
least about learning, and the damage it does
because of its high-stake status is
incalculable, both to the students who are
forced out of school without a diploma because
they don't think they can pass and how it
displaces meaningful learning," he said.
``Starting in the primary grades, teachers feel
compelled to help kids prepare for a
standardized test instead of becoming deep thinkers."
Certainly, there are lots of divergent views on
the value of the MCAS. But the state went too
far, way too far, in basically demanding that a critic shut up.
MCAS may have become less controversial over the
years. The vast majority of students pass it,
for one thing, and it has gradually become part
of the educational landscape, the way charter schools have.
Kohn worries, though, about the students who
drop out of school because they don't think they
will ever pass it. Worth worrying about, too, is
the political environment that makes such
testing popular. I've listened to plenty of
politicians demonize teachers and make
pronouncements about ``accountability" when it
was obvious that they had given little thought
to what makes education work. All too often, it becomes a buzzword.
``If you don't know much about education, it
sounds reasonable at first hearing to say we
want to hold schools accountable for giving our
kids an excellent education," Kohn said. ``In
the abstract, so do I. So does everyone. If you
don't know much about how to assess the quality
of teaching and learning, you may be snookered
into believing that standardized tests are a
measure and that high-stakes testing keeps
teachers on the straight and narrow."
The Department of Education, for the record, has
always denied that it was trying to keep Kohn
from talking, stating that the conference was
about other topics. Kohn scoffs at that notion, and Zobel rejected it as well.
Kohn speculates that the MCAS may have mobilized
opposition to high-stakes testing. If enough
parents complain and want to opt out, then the
test could be in jeopardy. That's an advocate
speaking, not an analyst; the MCAS isn't going anyplace.
Just the same, the debate over high-stakes
testing and its consequences for children is
well worth having, even now. Government should
encourage debate, not stifle it. Kohn's was a
victory for free exchange of ideas. I think that makes it a win for education.
Adrian Walker is a Globe columnist. He can be
reached at <mailto:walker@globe.com>walker@globe.com
©
<http://www.boston.com/help/bostoncom_info/copyright>Copyright
2006 The New York Times Company
Post a Message to ca-resisters:
|