[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Slow at most everything


  • To: ca-resisters@interversity.org
  • Subject: Slow at most everything
  • From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:55:14 -0700



Posted on Susan Ohanian's website...

Slow at most everything

Conversations with novelist Richard Ford in the New Yorker and Ploughshares reveal important principles about the speed reading and speed writing that schools demand of students today. Standardistos should tattoo these bon mots on their foreheads, so as to be visible when they endlessly gaze in the mirror for curricular revelation.

by Susan Ohanian

http://susanohanian.org/show_atrocities.php?id=6493

New Yorker fiction editor Deborah Treisman <http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/articles/060828on_onlineonly02>talks to Richard Ford about his new novel The Lay of the Land, noting that the three books featuring Frank Bascombe have each come about a decade apart.

Treisman: Is there any significance to that gap? Is that how long it takes for you to want to go back to Frank?

Richard Ford: I?m slow at most everything. It just took me that long to accumulate material to make this book. I might?ve taken longer, but I was probably afraid that nobody would remember the other books. Or that I might just croak.


I'm slow at most everything.

Ford's Independence Day won both the Pulitzer Prize and the PEN/Faulkner Award.

In <http://www.pshares.org/issues/article.cfm?prmarticleID=4087>About Richard Ford: A Profile (Ploughshares, Fall 1996), Don Lee captures a wonderful picture of Ford's editing process:

In his final revisions of Independence Day, he twice read aloud the entire seven-hundred-page manuscript to detect any rough spots. Then he went through two more drafts with his editor at Knopf, Gary Fisketjon. Then, as the book was about to go to press, his British editor gently commented, really as an afterthought, that there seemed to be quite a few -ly adverbs in the novel. Ford looked, and agreed. ?In weak moments,? he says, ?a writer will use an -ly adverb when the verb isn?t strong enough.? He went through the manuscript yet again over the next two weeks, striking out every -ly adverb he could part with, and strengthening the accompanying verbs. ?It seemed there were about four thousand of them.?



Ford doesn't regard his mild dyslexia while growing up as a handicap. ?Being a slow reader admitted me to books at a very basic level­word by word. That doesn?t seem like bad preparation to me, if writers are people who essentially live in sentences.?


In an <http://www.identitytheory.com/people/birnbaum37.html>Identity Theory interview, Ford tells Robert Birnbaum, "But being a novelist, it is important to average your days. It's like Olympic diving. You throw out the high score and the low score. I threw out the low score yesterday. . . ."

That used to be how we did it in teaching--took the long view of student work--over time. Good days and bad days. Now everything depends on the test day.

­ Richard Ford quotes, ed. by Susan Ohanian
New Yorker, Ploughshares, and Identity Theory
2006-08-25
<http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/articles/060828on_onlineonly02>http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/articles/060828on_onlineonly02


Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: