[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Slow at most everything
- To: ca-resisters@interversity.org
- Subject: Slow at most everything
- From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:55:14 -0700
Posted on Susan Ohanian's website...
Slow at most everything
Conversations with novelist Richard Ford in the
New Yorker and Ploughshares reveal important
principles about the speed reading and speed
writing that schools demand of students today.
Standardistos should tattoo these bon mots on
their foreheads, so as to be visible when they
endlessly gaze in the mirror for curricular revelation.
by Susan Ohanian
http://susanohanian.org/show_atrocities.php?id=6493
New Yorker fiction editor Deborah Treisman
<
http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/articles/060828on_onlineonly02>talks
to Richard Ford about his new novel The Lay of
the Land, noting that the three books featuring
Frank Bascombe have each come about a decade apart.
Treisman: Is there any significance to that gap?
Is that how long it takes for you to want to go back to Frank?
Richard Ford: I?m slow at most everything. It
just took me that long to accumulate material to
make this book. I might?ve taken longer, but I
was probably afraid that nobody would remember
the other books. Or that I might just croak.
I'm slow at most everything.
Ford's Independence Day won both the Pulitzer
Prize and the PEN/Faulkner Award.
In
<
http://www.pshares.org/issues/article.cfm?prmarticleID=4087>About
Richard Ford: A Profile (Ploughshares, Fall
1996), Don Lee captures a wonderful picture of Ford's editing process:
In his final revisions of Independence Day, he
twice read aloud the entire seven-hundred-page
manuscript to detect any rough spots. Then he
went through two more drafts with his editor at
Knopf, Gary Fisketjon. Then, as the book was
about to go to press, his British editor gently
commented, really as an afterthought, that there
seemed to be quite a few -ly adverbs in the
novel. Ford looked, and agreed. ?In weak
moments,? he says, ?a writer will use an -ly
adverb when the verb isn?t strong enough.? He
went through the manuscript yet again over the
next two weeks, striking out every -ly adverb he
could part with, and strengthening the
accompanying verbs. ?It seemed there were about four thousand of them.?
Ford doesn't regard his mild dyslexia while
growing up as a handicap. ?Being a slow reader
admitted me to books at a very basic levelword
by word. That doesn?t seem like bad preparation
to me, if writers are people who essentially live in sentences.?
In an
<
http://www.identitytheory.com/people/birnbaum37.html>Identity
Theory interview, Ford tells Robert Birnbaum,
"But being a novelist, it is important to average
your days. It's like Olympic diving. You throw
out the high score and the low score. I threw out
the low score yesterday. . . ."
That used to be how we did it in teaching--took
the long view of student work--over time. Good
days and bad days. Now everything depends on the test day.
Richard Ford quotes, ed. by Susan Ohanian
New Yorker, Ploughshares, and Identity Theory
2006-08-25
<
http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/articles/060828on_onlineonly02>
http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/articles/060828on_onlineonly02
Post a Message to ca-resisters: