[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: [arn2-strategy] NCLB Tutoring Unfulfilled Promise


  • To: CA Resisters <ca-resisters@interversity.org>
  • Subject: Fwd: [arn2-strategy] NCLB Tutoring Unfulfilled Promise
  • From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:07:14 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=JvFTOjElwCWVfySzpbmQ+qQi6tDNLwD/ufnbXxN4n+niMRi6iTeAFr31BhOy3tFY; h=Received:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;



Begin forwarded message:

From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:03:55 PM US/Pacific
To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [arn2-strategy] NCLB Tutoring Unfulfilled Promise
Reply-To: arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com

TUTORING PROMISE PROVING HARD TO KEEP

Associated Press -- August 26, 2006
by Ben Feller

Sandra Senda wanted a free private tutor for her kids, just like the No
Child Left Behind law promised. She had no idea the deal came with a big
headache.

She could not get an answer about when the program would start. By the
time it did, half the school year was gone. Her son was accepted but her
daughter was not, without explanation.

Exasperated, Senda went to her school board with a message: "It's not
fair. Our tax dollars are going to this stuff. I want help for my
daughter. I expect to get it."

She finally did. And as the new school year begins in Hialeah, Fla.,
Senda is determined to get her daughter, Genesis, into tutoring right
away this time — without the hassle.

As ideas go, the federal promise of free tutoring was bold. It also is
proving hard to keep.

Sluggish enrollment, local resistance, questionable oversight, and poor
outreach to parents have hampered a program that Congress adopted nearly
five years ago.

Of more than 2.2 million children eligible for tutoring, only 19 percent
of them got it in 2004-05, according to auditors at the congressional
Government Accountability Office.

Enrollment is rising, but still fewer than two of 10 eligible kids take
part.

"It's appalling," said Michael Petrilli, who helped oversee the first
years of the program for the Education Department.

"There are places in this country where poor parents have no idea that
free tutoring is even available for them," said Petrilli, now a policy
leader for the Fordham Foundation, a conservative education think tank.

Participation is the best gauge of the program because there is no firm
data yet about what matters most — whether tutoring is helping students
do better in math and reading.

There are encouraging signs.

The number of students in tutoring almost quadrupled from 2003 to 2005.
Some districts have used aggressive and creative means to reach out to
parents.

But even optimistic observers acknowledge progress has been slow. In
one-fifth of districts where tutoring was required, not a single student
received services, the GAO found.

"At the very least, we should be reaching half the kids," said Jeanne
Allen, president of The Center for Education Reform, which lobbies to
expand choices for parents.

"We should be able to do that with very little effort," she said.

President Bush's education law promises choices. If a school receives
federal poverty aid and does not make its goals for two straight years,
students can transfer to a better school.

But many parents skip that offer and chose tutoring instead. The option
of a free tutor for poor children kicks in when a school falls short for
three straight years.

Parents can pick any tutor from a list approved by their state. That
often includes private tutors who would be too expensive for parents if
they had to pay out of pocket.

Yet there have been snags everywhere. Among the familiar ones:

_Schools that cannot recruit tutors for students in highly rural areas,
or for students with disabilities, no matter where they live.

_School districts that do not tell parents that tutoring is available.
Some letters sent home to parents come too late or are written in jargon
that is hard to understand.

_Tutors who are not allowed into schools, limiting their access to
students. Some tutors and teachers never coordinate their lessons, so
students get disjointed instruction.

_States that do not evaluate the quality of tutors, as the law requires.
No state yet has conclusive data linking tutoring to better student
performance, the GAO found.

Even the way the law works is awkward, Allen said.

It requires the school districts to acknowledge that their schools have
fallen short, give up some federal aid and promote the tutoring program
even if they do not support it.

Indeed, surveys show many school leaders are skeptical that tutoring
will help.

Districts must reserve up to 20 percent of federal aid for tutoring and
student transfers. That would not come close to covering the costs for
all eligible children.

But money often is not the problem. Districts tend to spend much less
than they can.

In Broward County, Fla., school leaders sent a letter to parents that
actually discouraged parents from seeking tutoring for their children.
"We feel strongly that these funds can be much better spent helping
students in the classroom," the district superintendent wrote.

The state did not go for that. It ordered the district to write a new
letter. Florida lawmakers have also ordered statewide changes this year
to help more parents sign up.

Cheri Pierson Yecke, the chancellor of K-12 public schools in Florida,
said many school principals in her state have embraced tutoring. Others
ask her what is in it for them.

She tells them tutors can help kids do better on tests, which in turn
keeps the school out of federal trouble. "Once schools start to look at
it that way, they're much more aggressive about getting parents
enrolled," she said.

Congressional leaders who backed Bush's law are anxious for results,
too. The Education Department has loosened its rules in some cities in
hopes of spurring more enrollment.

Education Secretary Margaret Spellings has warned state leaders that she
is ready to withhold money from states and districts that do not comply.
The agency says it has done a lot to help, although the GAO admonished
the department for not providing enough guidance.

"We all have to step up our vigilance," Spellings says of the various
agencies involved.

In places where the tutoring program seems to be working, there is a
theme: Schools are involved as a partner, as opposed to being ordered to
comply and get out of the way.

"Smart providers think of themselves as a guest in somebody's home,"
said Steven Pines, executive director of the Education Industry
Association, which represents private tutors.

"If you have that kind of humility, you are more likely to be embraced,"
he said. "Providers are getting more savvy about this, or else they are
not going to be invited back."

Ultimately, he said, parents decide what works.

In Washington, D.C., Stephanie Hayes has used the private tutoring
option for two years. No hassles here. She has seen big changes in the
reading skills of her 8-year-old son, Dion.

"I'm not looking at this on a political level," Hayes said. "I'm just
grateful that someone decided that we need to do this for these kids."

___

On The Net:

Background from the Education Department:

http://www.ed.gov/nclb/choice/help/ses/index.html

The Center for Education Reform: http://www.edreform.com

Florida Department of Education: http://www.fldoe.org





Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arn2-strategy/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
arn2-strategy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/







Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: