Re: Fwd: [LiteracyForAll] Bribes as school reform: Crawford comments

[Michelle Montali <michel1282@cox.net>]

“There are lots of kids who think education is not 
> relevant to them, who think education is a waste of 
> time”...  And we have no leverage to make them think otherwise because we're teaching to an irrelevant test!  Shame on us. Of all the vile things NCLB had engendered, this might just take the cake.
---- Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org> wrote: 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: Stephen Krashen <skrashen@yahoo.com>
> > Date: Thu Aug 9, 2007  4:46:35 PM US/Pacific
> > To: literacyForAll@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [LiteracyForAll] Bribes as school reform: Crawford comments
> > Reply-To: LiteracyForAll@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Re: “Some Wonder if Cash for Good Test Scores Is the
> > Wrong Kind of Lesson” (On Education, Aug. 9):
> >
> > Establish an accountability system based on short-term
> > outputs. Count only the outputs that can be measured
> > on a standardized test. Use test scores to set
> > arbitrary targets for progress. Mandate severe
> > consequences for failure to meet those targets. Create
> > an atmosphere of high stakes and high stress for
> > teachers and students alike.
> > Is it any wonder that bribery has become the latest
> > stage of “school reform”?
> > James Crawford
> > President,  Institute for Language and Education
> > Policy
> >
> >
> >
> > Some Wonder if Cash for Good Test Scores Is the Wrong
> > Kind of Lesson
> > By JOSEPH BERGER
> > Published: August 8, 2007
> > Should cash be used to spur children to do better on
> > reading and math tests?
> > Suzanne Windland, a homeowner raising three children
> > in a placid enclave of eastern Queens, doesn’t think
> > so. Her seventh grader, Alexandra, she said, had
> > perfect scores last year. But she doesn’t want New
> > York City’s Department of Education to hand her $500
> > in spending cash for that achievement. That’s what
> > Alexandra would earn if her school was part of a pilot
> > program that will reward fourth and seventh graders
> > with $100 to $500, depending on how well they perform
> > on 10 tests in the next year.
> > Mrs. Windland wants Alexandra to do well for all the
> > timeless reasons — to cultivate a love of learning,
> > advance to more competitive schools and the like. She
> > has on occasion bought her children toys or taken them
> > out for dinner when they brought home pleasurable
> > report cards, but she does not believe in dangling
> > rewards beforehand.
> > “It’s like giving kids an allowance because they wake
> > up every morning and brush their teeth and go off to
> > school,” she said. “That’s their job. That’s what
> > they’re supposed to be doing.”
> > Actually, Alexandra will probably not be eligible for
> > the reward because the program, which has been adapted
> > from a similar Mexican cash incentives plan, is aimed
> > largely at schools with students from low-income
> > families. Mrs. Windland, who grew up for a time on
> > food stamps but now works as coordinator of volunteers
> > for a social services agency, thinks it is unfair that
> > Alexandra will see other seventh graders being
> > rewarded for far lower scores, while she savors only
> > the intangible plums of pride and satisfaction.
> > Mrs. Windland predicts that the impact of the program
> > may be paradoxical, with resentment depressing the
> > achievement of hard workers.
> > “The kids who don’t get reimbursed are going to say,
> > ‘Why should I bother!’ ” Mrs. Windland said.
> > There are parents who support the program. And Schools
> > Chancellor Joel I. Klein responds to skeptics by
> > arguing that no one has figured out how to get more
> > poorer children engaged in learning. Trumpeting the
> > long-term benefits of education, the better jobs and
> > lives well lived has not worked. Cash just might.
> > “There are lots of kids who think education is not
> > relevant to them, who think education is a waste of
> > time,” he said in an interview.
> > Still, critics warn Mr. Klein to be prepared for a
> > backlash from families, both poor and more well off.
> > The program will foster “ill will,” said Tim Johnson,
> > chairman of the Chancellor’s Parent Advisory Council,
> > whose members include Mrs. Windland.
> > “The word bribe comes to mind,” he said. “You
> > certainly don’t want kids with identical abilities,
> > where one gets paid and the other doesn’t.”
> > Some parents, like Nakida Chambers-Camille, a school
> > administrative assistant who lives in St. Albans,
> > Queens, think the program should be given a shot. Ms.
> > Chambers-Camille has a seventh grader, Leana, at a
> > school that probably won’t qualify. Leana, she
> > chuckled, may think that is unfair. But Ms. Camille
> > believes such sweeteners may ultimately benefit her
> > daughter. “If that’s going to help the child my child
> > is playing with, then I’m all for it,” she said. “I
> > want my child associating with people who have
> > education as a priority. If that child is not
> > learning, that child will pull my child down with
> > her.”
> > But Mr. Klein also has some opponents in poorer
> > communities that might benefit. Robert A. Reed Jr.,
> > president of the parents’ association of Public School
> > 46 in Harlem, a school where nearly all students
> > qualify for free lunches, called the program “dead
> > wrong” in an e-mail interview, saying children learn
> > “because they want it, not because they’re getting
> > paid.”
> > Mr. Klein, who grew up in public housing, could recall
> > nothing more in the way of carrots and sticks than an
> > allowance raise or a grounding for one of his bad
> > report cards. His interest in succeeding was quite
> > conventional.
> > “I wanted my parents’ approval,” Mr. Klein said. “I
> > found education interesting and exciting and I engaged
> > it in those terms. I thought education would create
> > opportunities my family didn’t have. My father said if
> > you want to grow up and not live in public housing,
> > pay attention in school.”
> > The crucial if amorphous role homes play in whether a
> > child succeeds is why Mr. Johnson thinks the
> > chancellor should come to grips with the limits of
> > what schools can do.
> > Other critics of the new program, like Sol Stern, a
> > senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, think Mr.
> > Klein should put the incentives into college funds,
> > saying instant cash undermines the idea of learning
> > for its own sake.
> > Another parent, Joan Rose Palacios, whose daughter
> > Olivia is a fourth grader in Queens, wondered: “What
> > happens when the money dries up? You pull a carrot
> > away, do they stop working?” But, she added, she is
> > keeping an open mind because she feels that schools in
> > poor neighborhoods need more aid.
> > The pilot, devised by Roland G. Fryer, a 30-year-old
> > Harvard economist who has studied racial inequality in
> > schools, is part of a wider program by Mayor Michael
> > R. Bloomberg’s administration that will offer cash to
> > adults for keeping a job, maintaining health
> > insurance, attending teacher conferences and getting
> > children to show up at school.
> > Laura Rawlings, an economist for the World Bank, which
> > finances $1.2 billion worth of incentive programs in
> > 12 countries like Mexico, says such programs have
> > raised school attendance.
> > The programs can be favorably seen as a form of income
> > maintenance that replaces pure entitlements by
> > requiring parents to commit to behaviors society
> > prefers. But the Mexican program does not reward
> > children for passing tests. And it may be hard to
> > explain to children, sensitive to any unfairness, why
> > one child is getting money while another with better
> > grades is not.
> > E-mail: joeberg@nytimes.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LiteracyForAll/
> >
> > <*> Your email settings:
> >     Individual Email | Traditional
> >
> > <*> To change settings online go to:
> >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LiteracyForAll/join
> >     (Yahoo! ID required)
> >
> > <*> To change settings via email:
> >     mailto:LiteracyForAll-digest@yahoogroups.com
> >     mailto:LiteracyForAll-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >     LiteracyForAll-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> >     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> Vote in the National Cheney Impeachment Poll
> http://www.usalone.com/blogvoices.php?Cheney%20Impeachment%3F
> Add this text to your own email and blog signatures!
> 
> -----------------------------------------------
> Report list problems to listmom@interversity.net