Re: CA State results shed new light on wealth vs. poverty debate.

[monicalucido@comcast.net]

Great letter Susan!
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
> I just sent this to the Bee. Since I dont live in Sac, they probably 
> wont publish it...
> 
> > Your article about the just-released test scores rightly points out 
> > that income correlates to scores pretty closely; that's why we call 
> > the API the Affluent Parents' Index. But research consistently shows 
> > that an even more accurate score predictor is mother's education, 
> > which is a proxy for class.
> >
> > California does not collect this information. Instead, it asks for 
> > "parent education level", which is either father's or mother's, 
> > whichever is higher. There's no way of knowing how truthfully families 
> > answer this question, even if the school asks it, and few do. Most 
> > schools simply guess.
> >
> > Whichever predictor we use?parents' education or income?it's clear 
> > that it gives us as much information as the test itself. So why do we 
> > continue to abuse children with this deeply flawed instrument? If 
> > scores roughly match income and education, to close the score gap all 
> > families will have to have higher income and education. That is, we 
> > will have to abolish poverty.
> >
> > In the meantime, let's stop pretending test scores tell us anything we 
> > don't already know, let's repeal No Child Left Behind, and let's stop 
> > the testing madness.
> >
> > Susan Harman for CalCARE
> 
> On Saturday, August 18, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Peter Farruggio wrote:
> 
> > Printed in the Sacramento Bee, official house organ for the California 
> > corporate standardistas.
> >
> > They're spinning the test results to divert the focus away from social 
> > class and poverty, which is clearly designed to avoid debate on 
> > underfunding, especially the criminal underfunding of low income urban 
> > schools, which are almost exclusively Black and Latino.  Heavens 
> > forbid we tax the rich and the lucrative corporations in CA to raise 
> > the revenue to fully fund quality public ed!!!!  At the ports of Long 
> > Beach and Oakland alone, huge profits are made from the Pacific Rim 
> > trade.
> >
> > Some questions about the questionable data they use:
> >
> > Where are all these "poor" white kids in CA, and how many are they?  
> > To my observation, they're concentrated in rural areas, certainly not 
> > in the devastated inner cities.  If their schools are anything like 
> > those in poor rural South Texas, then there is no comparison with the 
> > much worse dilapidated monstrosities of truly poor neighborhoods in 
> > Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, East Palo Alto, etc  Urban poverty 
> > in the US has become a multifaceted horror for child development, much 
> > different from rural poverty.  I haven't seen many white kids in the 
> > segregated working class urban schools.
> >
> > Middle class vs poor:  not qualifying for free lunch does not mean 
> > you're "middle class"  Research on the Black middle class has shown 
> > that few who qualify by higher income are truly as middle class as 
> > most upper income whites, as far as having non-job-related wealth and 
> > "country club" connections.  I think the "middle class" Blacks and 
> > Latinos they discuss in this propaganda piece are just working class 
> > families with "too much" income to qualify for free/reduced lunch.  
> > For the most part, their kids attend urban schools (low or medium 
> > income) that are crappy and doing test prep curricula.  The real 
> > middle class is in mostly white, well funded public schools or private 
> > schools
> >
> > Of course, the standardistas don't like to mention that most of CA's 
> > Latino kids are English Learners who are being tested in their second 
> > language.
> >
> > Pete Farruggio
> >
> >>
> >> ----------
> >>
> >>
> >> Tests show racial achievement gap
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> State results shed new light on wealth vs. poverty debate.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> By Laurel Rosenhall - Bee Staff Writer
> >> Published 12:00 am PDT Thursday, August 16, 2007
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Whether they are poor or rich, white students are scoring higher than 
> >> their African American and Latino classmates on the state's 
> >> standardized tests, results released Wednesday show. And in some 
> >> cases, the poorest white students are doing better than Latino and 
> >> black students who come from middle class or wealthy families.
> >>
> >> The so-called achievement gap -- the difference in performance 
> >> between groups of students -- has long been chalked up to a 
> >> difference in family income. It makes sense that -- regardless of 
> >> race -- students whose parents have money and speak English would do 
> >> better in school, on the whole, than students whose families struggle 
> >> with employment, food and shelter.
> >>
> >> But this year's test scores show that the difference in academic 
> >> achievement between ethnic groups is more than an issue of poverty 
> >> vs. wealth.
> >>
> >> On the standardized math tests that public school students take every 
> >> year from second to 11th grade, 38 percent of white students who 
> >> qualify for subsidized lunch scored proficient or above, compared 
> >> with 36 percent of Latino students and 30 percent of black students 
> >> whose families made too much money to qualify for school meals. On 
> >> standardized English tests, poor white students did about the same as 
> >> non-poor Latino and African American students.
> >>
> >> "These are not just economic achievement gaps," state Superintendent 
> >> Jack O'Connell said in announcing the test scores from an elementary 
> >> school in Inglewood.
> >>
> >> "They are racial achievement gaps, and we cannot continue to excuse 
> >> them."
> >>
> >> It's a new twist on what has become a common theme for O'Connell -- 
> >> the danger the achievement gap poses for California's economic 
> >> future. About 56 percent of the state's public school students are 
> >> Latino or black, so their academic performance now will have a big 
> >> influence on the work force of the future.
> >>
> >> "I've been pounding this drum and am going to continue to do so, not 
> >> just for the moral imperative that we have, but for the economic 
> >> imperative," O'Connell said.
> >>
> >> "We're going to focus on (the achievement gap) like a heat-seeking 
> >> missile during my last three years here as the state superintendent."
> >> In general, test scores were flat compared with last year, but up 
> >> from five years ago. Forty-one percent of students were proficient in 
> >> math this year, while 43 percent were proficient in English. Even 
> >> though students are doing better than five years ago -- when 35 
> >> percent were proficient in math and English -- the achievement gap 
> >> between racial groups has remained a constant, with white and Asian 
> >> American students scoring higher than their Latino and African 
> >> American peers.
> >>
> >> O'Connell said little Wednesday to explain why the achievement gap 
> >> persists.
> >>
> >> "That is the $50 billion question," said Francisco Estrada, public 
> >> policy director for the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, one of 
> >> several Latino and African American activists who lauded O'Connell 
> >> for drawing attention to the issue, even while they criticized the 
> >> state government for not doing enough to improve education for 
> >> students of color.
> >>
> >> "Superintendent O'Connell should be commended for not just simply 
> >> saying, 'We're doing great and let's keep doing what we're doing,' 
> >> which is what we've heard in other years," Estrada said.
> >>
> >> Russlynn Ali, director of Education Trust West, said state 
> >> policymakers are responsible for the achievement gap that has kept 
> >> black and Latino students behind because they've done little to put 
> >> experienced, well-trained teachers and rigorous high-level courses in 
> >> schools that predominantly serve those groups.
> >>
> >> "Our system takes poor kids and kids of color -- not just the 
> >> students of color who are poor -- and provides them less of 
> >> everything research says makes a difference," she said.
> >>
> >> "That is the underlying cause of the achievement gap."
> >>
> >> While Ali blamed the government for distributing resources 
> >> inequitably, others said the gap is due to teachers' expectations.
> >>
> >> "The expectations are not as high for African American students as 
> >> they are for other students," said Anita Royston, an education 
> >> consultant who used to work for the Sacramento City Unified School 
> >> District.
> >>
> >> That district's school board president once found the same to be true 
> >> in his Latino family. In 1989, Manny Hernandez said, his son was 
> >> forbidden from taking college-prep classes in high school.
> >>
> >> "That kind of tracking took place, not because people were bad or 
> >> racist, but because that was the expectation," Hernandez said.
> >> When he became a school board member some years later, Hernandez 
> >> wanted to change the district's expectations about who goes to 
> >> college. The Sacramento City Unified school board increased 
> >> graduation requirements, so that more students will graduate with 
> >> more of the courses necessary to enter college.
> >>
> >> Sharroky Hollie sees the achievement gap yet another way. He is a 
> >> professor of teacher education at California State University, 
> >> Dominguez Hills, who focuses on strategies that help Latino and 
> >> African American students learn. Hollie says the achievement gap 
> >> reflects a biased education system that doesn't accept behaviors and 
> >> learning styles common in African American and Latino communities.
> >>
> >> For example, he said, an African American student who is talkative 
> >> and frequently gets out of his seat will be seen as disruptive and 
> >> defiant in most schools. Instead, Hollie said, teachers should 
> >> develop teaching strategies that work with the student's social and 
> >> kinesthetic nature, a trait that could be attributed to his cultural 
> >> background.
> >>
> >> "The first thing we want schools to do is to change their mind-set in 
> >> seeing these behaviors as cultural and not negative," he said. "The 
> >> rest of it is: How can the instruction be reshaped to validate and 
> >> affirm the cultural behaviors as a segue to standards-based >> learning?"
> >>
> >> Testing experts said too many factors affect test scores to attribute 
> >> the racial differences to any one thing. Jamal Abedi of the UC Davis 
> >> School of Education said the test questions use complex language that 
> >> may throw students off, particularly those who are not native English 
> >> speakers or who speak in the vernacular at home.
> >>
> >> "Those terms prevent students from understanding the assessment 
> >> questions," he said. "Therefore, they may not be able to respond."
> >> Wednesday's release shows how students did on the California 
> >> Standards Tests they took in the spring. Their scores are divided 
> >> into five categories -- advanced, proficient, basic, below basic and 
> >> far below basic. The goal is for all students to reach proficient or 
> >> advanced. Later this month, the state Department of Education will 
> >> use these scores to calculate an Academic Performance Index number 
> >> for each school and to determine whether schools are meeting the 
> >> requirements set by No Child Left Behind.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> Vote in the National Cheney Impeachment Poll
> http://www.usalone.com/blogvoices.php?Cheney%20Impeachment%3F
> Add this text to your own email and blog signatures!
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> If you want to help support the operation of Ca-Resisters,
> visit http://interversity.org/donations.html and pitch in!
> -----------------
> Thanks in advance!
> -Eric Crump