[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
grade level/proficiency
- To: CA Resisters <ca-resisters@interversity.org>
- Subject: grade level/proficiency
- From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:16:54 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=LHuwlPBCD/5KuWDjiQhkujfx6ojKKeAhznp0Gfak89n2F0EyvTOOEgVbO5S9YBLG; h=Received:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
This may seem minor, but its not. NCLB calls for Proficiency. The
BOGSAT (Bunch of Guys Sitting Around a Table, as they call the test
makers) decided to adopt the NAEP definition of Proficient, which works
out to be between 70% and 80%. But the Bushies and Miller keep batting
their eyelashes and saying, Isnt it reasonable to expect everyone to
read a grade level? Grade level, if it means anything (and it doesnt,
except on a test) is the 50%. A big difference between 50 and 80. And
even 50% means half the kids fail.
Susan
Vote in the National Cheney Impeachment Poll
http://www.usalone.com/blogvoices.php?Cheney%20Impeachment%3F
Add this text to your own email and blog signatures!
Post a Message to ca-resisters: