[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Educational Change


  • To: ca-resisters@serv1.ncte.org, <ca-resisters@interversity.org>
  • Subject: Educational Change
  • From: George Sheridan <learn@jps.net>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:37:32 -0800
  • Cc: ARN-l@interversity.org



On January 28, CTA's State Council of Education

Council approved new recommendations for assessment and testing. These recommendations are all based on CTA's current policy, but are a step toward developing a comprehensive plan for Educational Change and could become the basis for educational, media, and community outreach campaigns as well as legislative proposals. Among the recommendations were:
* Reform the state assessment and accountability program from a punitive system to a prescriptive system to assist teachers;
* Move decision-making authority in the selection and use of assessments from federal and state levels to local districts, schools and teachers. These decisions must be subject to collective bargaining. As professional educators, teachers must have autonomy in developing and using assessments for students at their grade and subject levels;
* Establish a process to make the state's academic content standards age- and developmentally appropriate. Recognize that all students can learn; however, no standard, assessment or performance target is appropriate for all students;
* Ensure that the tests are not biased and do not discriminate against any student. Assess students with special needs in relation to the students' individual goals and objectives on the IEP or Section 504 plan;
* Assess academic achievement of students whose primary language is other than English in the child's primary language, or in English once fluency is attained;
* Use multiple measures to gather a complete picture of student, school and district achievement. Do not evaluate students, schools or districts based on a single test score. Students should not be denied a diploma based on the results of a single, high-stakes exit exam when the student has met all other district criteria for graduation;
* Allow teachers to determine which instructional strategies and assessments to use for teaching and learning;
* Use valid and reliable multiple measures to report overall growth of students over time;
* Provide schools the resources necessary to close achievement gaps rather than imposing negative labels and punitive sanctions;
* Limit the scope of all assessments to the appropriate school year and/or subject area;
* Reduce significantly the number of federal, state, district and school-mandated tests;
* Prohibit federal, state, or district-mandated standardized tests in grades two and below.
I have deleted some lines and shortened some for clarity, without, I believe, altering their meaning. The recommendations will become part of CTA's Educational Change Workgroup Report.
The original report, dealing with adequacy and equity in funding, teacher compensation, teacher development, and assistance to schools, was approved by the CTA Board of Directors in July 2005.



George Sheridan

Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: