[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: [arn2-strategy] NEA Members Voe to


  • To: ca-resisters@interversity.org
  • Subject: Re: Fwd: [arn2-strategy] NEA Members Voe to
  • From: Rich Gibson <rgibson@pipeline.com>
  • Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 17:08:42 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=pipeline.com; b=kzAkchvqhM3xtmFjSgiozhDrldfKv2fBacdA/4vw/zIiLPdVOYXXv2lfWX7Kkh29; h=Received:Message-Id:X-Sender:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • In-reply-to: <C5D03BD1-0B0F-11DB-8D0E-000A95E4AD80@igc.org>

NEA will not challenge the NCLB. The NEA will support it, as will every other bogus liberal effort to reform it. NEA leaders will ask to get paid more to implement it, and perhaps implement it more gently (on teachers, not kids) but they will support the NCLB. Why?

Liberals and labor bosses pave the way for fascism by urging working people, like school workers, to ally with their national bosses, to choose one lesser evil after the next, until real evil is ratified. They deny the sharp class struggle, an international war of the rich on the poor, that is going on all over the world.

The union leaders divide working people, teachers from students, parents, community people, and even from other school workers, like bus drivers or cafeteria workers, usually putting "support personnel" in separate groupings, sometimes refusing to admit them at all, when it is easy to see that control of the work place --power--depends on uniting people.

NEA and AFT leaders objectively seek to maintain the apartheid nature of a teaching force that is 90%-plus, white, by tacking on more and more costly requirements for teacher certification in education schools where racism, ignorance, opportunism and fear drive programs and policies.

Why?

Because many liberals and labor bosses profit from betraying the people they claim to represent, as does the leadership of NEA, the AFT, and the rest of the labor aristocracy in the US.

There is a direct line from the profits of imperialism (as the Iraq, Caspian, and Venezuelan oil wars demonstrate) and the relatively big money earned by NEA bosses, in a few cases more than $400,000 a year. That salary is a bribe for betrayal, and the NEA bosses know it. They betray rank and file school workers, and they betray working people all over the world, at the same time.

The NEA leadership now meeting in Orlando really has nothing to do, because they have no plan to oppose racist wars (that will eat up the children now in school, kids taught nationalism as if they, and Bill Gates, had something real in common). They have no plan to oppose racist high stakes testing. No plan to fight for free national health care. No plan to even defend the most rudimentary of educational projects. They have no plan because they are on the other side.

The only interesting news to come out of the NEA representative assembly is who is sleeping with who (which at NEA ra's is always interesting).

NEA leaders only plan is to lure school workers into supporting causes that will only harm those same school workers. They deserve to be treated, not as misguided fools, nor as potential allies, and certainly not as leaders---but enemies.

Here is what is really happening with the NEA's support for the NCLB (NEA backed it from the beginning, and the AFT not only backed it, Al Shanker, AFT's overlord, initiated it) http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2006607030374

Merit pay base on student test performance.

The more teachers administer these Big Tests, which any thinking person can easily see are forms of child abuse, the more teachers coil the noose for their own hangings. Classroom school workers who, wittingly or unwittingly, take the bribe from imperialism to betray the best interests of their students will not get the bribe for long.

As I said in 1994, wages will be linked to test results.

Those teachers in poor, superexploited, immigrant and black districts will get hit first, losing wages and benefits.

Then, with the school worker force materially divided, suburban teacher wages will be cut as well, following a pattern industrial workers lived through thirty years ago.

For a longer examination of the role of union leaders, and others, see this on the death of the UAW
http://www.rohan.sdsu.edu/%7Ergibson/UAWJune2006.htm

There are better ways to organize and fight back
www.rougeforum.org


Happy 4th

and up the rebels.

best r





At 08:47 PM 7/3/2006 -0700, you wrote:


Begin forwarded message:

From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon Jul 3, 2006 1:34:08 PM US/Pacific
To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>, rethinkaccountdc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [arn2-strategy] NEA Members Voe to Challenge NCLB
Reply-To: arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com

NEA TO CHALLENGE "NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND"

Associated Press -- July 3, 2006
by Phil Davis

An overwhelming majority of delegates from the nation's largest
education union approved a plan Monday to aggressively lobby Congress
for reform of the No Child Left Behind Act.

The National Education Association has fought to change the measure
since its beginnings in 2001, but this is the union's most organized
effort to date, said Joel Packer, the NEA's policy manager on the act.

"We're moving from just being critics to saying this is our own vision,"
Packer said. "It is very powerful because it's the voices of classroom
teachers."

In an hourlong discussion, only three of the 9,000 members of the
union's Representative Assembly argued against the lobbying effort. They
said the law was too flawed to fix and wanted the union to focus on
repealing it.

A significant number of delegates shouted "No" during the vote, but not
enough to swing the outcome.

Union leaders say the basic intentions of No Child Left Behind ? quality
schools and skilled teachers ? are good. But the government's
"obsessive" focus on testing student skills and punishing failing
schools undermines education, said Becky Pringle, a member of the NEA
Executive Committee that drafted the new policy.

The plan approved Monday calls for increases in the $23.5 billion budget
currently authorized by Congress and a decrease in the number of
students in each classroom. The union also is calling for a national
minimum wage of $40,000 a year for teachers.

The NEA will push the government to move away from testing as the sole
benchmark for success or failure. The teachers favor a series of
benchmarks that reflect students' differing demographics and abilities.

NEA President Reg Weaver said the union is securing support from
lawmakers and other education organizations.

"The substance of our changes, everybody knows they are good," Weaver
said. "We have all kinds of organizations that want this law changed.
It's just a matter of the political climate. It's good. We're on the
road to success."

The No Child Left Behind Act, passed by Congress in 2001, was championed
by President Bush as a way to hold schools accountable. It is up for
reauthorization in 2007, but Weaver said he expects debate on reform
will come after the 2008 presidential election.

The law requires schools to test students in math and reading and report
their scores by group, such as race, disability, English language
ability or economic situation. If one group of students fails, an entire
school can face penalties.

"It expects every child to progress at the same level and they don't.
One size doesn't fit all," said Marilyn Petersen, a Houston-area
delegate who has taught special education for 55 years. "We're putting
politics in the classroom."

The law initially enjoyed bipartisan support in Congress, but financial
support has declined as the war in Iraq and other priorities have made
increasing demands on the federal budget. About $1 billion was trimmed
from the program's budget this year, and the NEA expects $500 million
more will be cut in 2007.

Packer said Monday's vote reflects a recent NEA member attitude survey
of 1,000 NEA members, which found a majority dislikes the No Child Left
Behind Act but would rather modify it than repeal it.

About 30 percent of NEA members approve of the law, the survey found.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/x3XolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arn2-strategy/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
arn2-strategy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



-----------------------------------------------
Report list problems to listmom@interversity.net






Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: