[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
FSRN and NCLB
- To: KPFA <kpfaed@lists.kpfa.org>
- Subject: FSRN and NCLB
- From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:02:01 -0700
Hey, what's up with the good folks at Free Speech Radio News? Do
they not get it about NCLB and the total corruption of education
reform by the corporate standardistas?
I just heard their news show on KPFA this afternoon. They did a spot
on NCLB and Special Education students. The reporter started off
with an introduction of "education expert" Dan Soifer of the
Lexington Institute, and then played a ten second segment of his
speech about how "critics of NCLB are not correct when they claim
that Special Ed students' test scores are preventing schools from
meeting their annual growth targets." In other words, this spin
doctor got free rein to spew his propaganda with no explanation from
the reporter that he represents a right wing think tank. The whole
point of the report concerned the congressional hearings about NCLB
and special needs students and English Learners (didn't hear anything
about the ELs, though). It seems that the reporter got snookered by
the standardista phony-populist snowjob that we need "equity" for
Special Ed students and so they shouldn't be separated out from the
high stakes tests (the bias of low expectations). Right after
Soifer, she did a segment on some woman who had been a Special Ed
student and who had had to fight for her right to be mainstreamed,
and who eventually earned a PhD and is now advocating for
"non-segregation" of Special Ed students (I smell the old argument
for cutting services and "allowing" them to pull themselves up by
their own bootstraps). Then for "balance," they heard from US Rep
Lynn Woolsey, who gave a brief and wimpy statement about the need for
special services.
At no point was a real education expert presented to explain the
overall picture of NCLB and special needs kids, and to explain the
nature of Lexington Institute and their political motivation for
supporting NCLB.
Sounded to me like FSRN fell for the hype, hook, line, and sinker.
Can somebody enlighten them about NCLB, its phony populist rhetoric
and its attack on public education? And don't they know enough about
Lexington Institute to at least be suspicious???!!!!!
Pete Farruggio
Post a Message to ca-resisters: