[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

FSRN and NCLB


  • To: KPFA <kpfaed@lists.kpfa.org>
  • Subject: FSRN and NCLB
  • From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:02:01 -0700

Hey, what's up with the good folks at Free Speech Radio News? Do they not get it about NCLB and the total corruption of education reform by the corporate standardistas?

I just heard their news show on KPFA this afternoon. They did a spot on NCLB and Special Education students. The reporter started off with an introduction of "education expert" Dan Soifer of the Lexington Institute, and then played a ten second segment of his speech about how "critics of NCLB are not correct when they claim that Special Ed students' test scores are preventing schools from meeting their annual growth targets." In other words, this spin doctor got free rein to spew his propaganda with no explanation from the reporter that he represents a right wing think tank. The whole point of the report concerned the congressional hearings about NCLB and special needs students and English Learners (didn't hear anything about the ELs, though). It seems that the reporter got snookered by the standardista phony-populist snowjob that we need "equity" for Special Ed students and so they shouldn't be separated out from the high stakes tests (the bias of low expectations). Right after Soifer, she did a segment on some woman who had been a Special Ed student and who had had to fight for her right to be mainstreamed, and who eventually earned a PhD and is now advocating for "non-segregation" of Special Ed students (I smell the old argument for cutting services and "allowing" them to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps). Then for "balance," they heard from US Rep Lynn Woolsey, who gave a brief and wimpy statement about the need for special services.
At no point was a real education expert presented to explain the overall picture of NCLB and special needs kids, and to explain the nature of Lexington Institute and their political motivation for supporting NCLB.

Sounded to me like FSRN fell for the hype, hook, line, and sinker.

Can somebody enlighten them about NCLB, its phony populist rhetoric and its attack on public education? And don't they know enough about Lexington Institute to at least be suspicious???!!!!!

Pete Farruggio




Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: