[ Author Prev][ Author Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Author Index][ Thread Index]
Fwd: [arn2-strategy] Teachers and a Law that Distrusts Them
- To: CA Resisters <ca-resisters@interversity.org>
- Subject: Fwd: [arn2-strategy] Teachers and a Law that Distrusts Them
- From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:46:17 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=a+PNHI8CEl0TEM8ATIsEQLmd+WAfpD0N9hLtIcNFWHQhICMOvVq5PFwSsvow3U5U; h=Received:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:30:23 AM US/Pacific
To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, arn2-strategy
<arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [arn2-strategy] Teachers and a Law that Distrusts Them
Reply-To: arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com
TEACHERS, AND A LAW THAT DISTRUSTS THEM
New York Times "On Education" Column -- July 12, 2006
by Michael Winerip
This is my last education column after four years. What I will miss
most
is the free ticket it gave me into classrooms all over the country,
where I watched and learned from teachers.
I got to be there at 7:15 a.m. on the first day of this school year
with
Irene Ray, a terrific high school English teacher in Huntington, W. Va.
Ms. Ray had intended to leave small-town Appalachia long ago for the
big
city, but there she was again, for her 23rd first day, sipping a Diet
Coke, nibbling an Atkins breakfast bar, more excited and jittery than
her students, wanting to know how their summer reading went, whether
they’d enjoyed “The Scarlet Letter” or, like Ms. Ray, preferred “The
Poisonwood Bible.”
Ms. Ray spent a week readying her room for the first day, including
adding to the favorite quotations that line her walls. Bored students
distracted by iPods and the Internet? “She’s got new quotes,” whispered
a girl, who was reading Ms. Ray’s walls.
I also got to be there at 3:15 p.m. on the final day of school this
year, in Dahlonega, Ga., at Lumpkin County Middle School, when Pat New,
a science teacher, taught her last lesson, after 29 years. Ms. New, 62,
had fought to the end for her right to teach evolution, winning out
against a group of parents and students and an administration that
preferred not to make waves.
The columns about teachers generated the most mail, but lots of others
were fun to write. Chronicling the mess-ups with New York State’s
standardized exams — in math, English, English as a second language,
physics, reading — was always great sport.
But the people who took me to the heart of education? Laurin MacLeish,
kindergarten teacher in Orlando, Fla.; Roger Cline, diesel engine
teacher in Canton, Ohio; Jeff Kaufman, G.E.D. teacher at the Rikers
jail
in New York City; Liza Levine, English teacher in South Central Los
Angeles.
Principals? A little bit. Superintendents? Chancellors? State education
commissioners? You can probably still name your kindergarten teacher
(that would be Miss Goddard, Beechwood Knoll School, 1957). But how
about the secretary of education during any of your 13 years in school?
The education press spends so much time writing about people far
removed
from the classroom that it’s easy to lose sight of those individuals’
real purpose — to help teachers do their jobs well, the best hope for
student success.
As readers know, I’m not a fan of No Child Left Behind, the 2002
federal
law aimed at raising education quality. Instead of helping teachers,
for
me it’s a law created by politicians who distrust teachers. Because
teachers’ judgment and standards are supposedly not reliable, the law
substitutes a battery of state tests that are supposed to tell the real
truth about children’s academic progress.
The question is: How successful can an education law be that makes
teachers the enemy?
Even No Child’s strongest supporters acknowledge that one of the law’s
most important provisions — to guarantee a highly qualified teacher in
every classroom — has been the most poorly carried out to date.
So, to improve classroom teaching and make teachers more enthusiastic
about the law, I have three departing suggestions for when the
legislation is expected to come up for reauthorization next year.
First, why not add a provision rewarding states and districts that
mandate small class size? It’s an idea that enjoys great support among
parents and teachers and is easily carried out on a national scale.
Why small class size? Deborah Meier, the teacher, principal, author and
MacArthur Award winner who has created successful public schools in New
York and Boston, says the best chance for educating poor children well
is surrounding them with as many talented adults as possible. The same
premise drives one of the most hopeful efforts in urban education
today,
the Gates Foundation’s small schools movement.
Joe Gipson, a black public school parent in California, which has had a
mandatory cap of 20 in grades K to three for a decade, told me small
class size is the best thing that’s happened to his children’s
education, giving them what rich private school pupils have. While
small
class size is no guarantee that teachers will be good, he said, with
just 20, you can tell faster if teachers are performing well, and get
rid of them if they’re not.
Gov. Jeb Bush
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/
jeb_bush/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
is very popular in Florida, and in 2002, he opposed a constitutional
amendment to cap class sizes, including a maximum of 18 for grades K to
three. He said it would be too costly. And yet voters in Florida,
hardly
a tax-and-spend state, voted for it. Every year since, the Republican
governor has tried overturning the class size amendment, and every year
he has lost, most recently last spring, when the Republican-controlled
State Senate defeated his efforts.
“It’s a moral issue,” said Senator J. Alex Villalobos, a Republican
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/r/
republican_party/index.html?inline=nyt-org>
whose wife is a public school teacher. “Class size is the great
equalizer. Anybody who has children understands this. We have a moral
responsibility to take care of our children.”
In 2003, 115,000 New York City residents signed petitions aimed at
setting class size limits, and in 2005, 100,000 did. Mayor Michael R.
Bloomberg has said the city cannot afford to do more now, and has
successfully stalled advocates’ efforts in court, but at a price to
children. A recent state audit shows that 26 percent of New York City
children in grades K to three are in classes of 25 or more.
The intent of the No Child law could not be more important — to narrow
the achievement gap between white and minority children. But what
angers
public educators is that under the law, schools get all the blame if
students fail, when they see many other variables at play, including
the
crippling effects of poverty on families. Studies show that the
economic
status of a child’s family has a major impact on a child’s performance
on standardized tests. On the SAT, for example, for every $10,000
increase in family income, a child’s SAT scores rise about 10 points.
Which leads to my second proposal. We need a No Family Left Behind Law.
This would measure economic growth of families and punish politicians
in
charge of states with poor economic growth for minority families.
FOR example, in Ohio, black families earn only 62 percent of white
household income, one of the biggest disparities nationally. So every
year, under No Family Left Behind, Ohio would be expected to close that
income gap. If it failed to make adequate yearly progress for black
families’ wealth, the governor and legislators would be judged failing,
and after five years, could be removed from office. This way public
schools wouldn’t be the only institutions singled out for failing poor
children.
And if states succeeded in closing the economic gap, test scores would
be expected to rise, giving politicians and teachers a chance to
celebrate together.
A final concern with the federal law is that it is so driven by state
testing that there’s too much time devoted to test prep, too much time
spent drilling facts for survey courses, and not enough emphasis on
finding something children will fall in love with for a lifetime — the
Civil War, repairing engines, science research, playing the trumpet.
Fortunately, the remedy can be found on Ms. Ray’s walls in Huntington,
W. Va., a quotation from William Butler Yeats: “Education is not the
filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire.” I recommend that as the
official motto for a new, revitalized No Child Left Behind law.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email
design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/x3XolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arn2-strategy/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
arn2-strategy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Post a Message to ca-resisters:
|