[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Latino Immigrants With Negative



Very enlightening observations and comments by Pete. The study mentioned a finding that Latinos who had a sense of "linked fate" with other Latinos tended to be less stereotyping of Blacks and I was trying to hypothesize why this may be BASED ON THEIR FINDINGS. However, Pete's extensive experience points in a different direction and this may well be because (assuming their data are correct) you are both looking at different sets of assumptions. While the study focused on stereotypes around personal traits (are these people easy to get along with? are they trustworthy? hardworking?) Pete's observations have more to do with political consciousness, activeness and savvy. Perhaps this is the reason for the different conclusions. Whatever the case, I have hopes, as Pete expressed, that the divide can be crossed by common needs to organize. I've also seen hopeful signs of this in my east Oakland school community, where parents, struggling to understand each other's language, nevertheless persisted in fighting together for a better education for all their kids (ie. against a charter).
--Naomi
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Farruggio<mailto:pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
To: ca-resisters@interversity.org<mailto:ca-resisters@interversity.org>
Cc: five-point-plan@egroups.com<mailto:five-point-plan@egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [ca-resisters] Latino Immigrants With Negative


I think Naomi's on the right track; but that it's a bit more complicated. Migration research in the past 10 years has found a phenomenon called "segmented assimilation" among various non-white immigrant groups in the US and Western Europe. In brief, they find that the immigrant youth, the "1.5 generation," tends to adapt to the social values of the local neighborhood in which their families have settled, regardless of their own race/ethnicity. For example, it was found that Haitian immigrant youth whose families arrived in the Liberty City area of Miami, an African American neighborhood plagued by chronic unemployment, substance abuse, crime, lousy schools, etc, tended to acquire dysfunctional lifestyles much more so than similar Haitian immigrant youth in other areas. The classic example of "successful" adaptation to life in the US is the Cuban immigrant communities across South Florida, where strong social networks with political and economic connections to the US mainstream have offered support to successive waves of new Cuban immigrants (like jobs, business loans, housing, etc) The point is that what we see in our local community influences our understanding of what we can do with our own lives. And I think this applies to adults as well as to young people.

In many years of organizing, first in the labor movement, then in school/community struggles, I've seen the low opinion of African Americans held by many Latino immigrants (Mexican and Central American). And I disagree with Naomi that this is confined to or more common among those people who have a "me first" individualist ethos. In fact, I've seen it mostly among people who have a strong collectivist consciousness, the folks who are most amenable to fighting together to join unions or engage in social struggle. Witness the recent million-plus turnout at immigrants' rights marches across the country, despite the threats of reprisals against the undocumented, to see a display of such collectivist consciousness and sense of solidarity. Then, why the low opinion of African Americans among such class conscious people? I think it's because they haven't seen their African American neighbors engaged in any kind of collective struggle. East Oakland is a good example. Not much organizing or social struggle has happened in the past 20 years. People are pretty beaten down, and all they get from their "leaders" (Democratic Party hacks and church pastors) is election time promises, influence peddling and general hustling. Numerous class conscious immigrants, ready and willing to fight the system, have expressed to me opinions that boil down to an estimation that most US Blacks are politically passive, personally corrupt, and easily subject to manipulation by hustling nationalist politicians. In other words, "we need to draw together to fight for a better life, and these people are incapable of joining us, they're hopeless."

Now for the good news. This nut is easily cracked by engaging in struggle and creating overtures across racial lines based on class solidarity. Witness the interracial organizing among high school students by groups like Youth Together, which started up in East Oakland. Witness the multiracial participation in the massive Chicago immigrant rights march this year. Also, in more than 20 years of organizing in the workplace, I've seen negative racial attitudes frequently overcome by the need to fight together against the common enemy, the boss. So, to best deal with this stereotyping, we need to follow Joe Hill's dying words: "Don't mourn, organize!"

Pete Farruggio





At 11:45 AM 7/21/2006, you wrote:

This is interesting... As one who works with Latino and Black populations together I can see that this syndrome does seem to exist in East Oakland, where Latinos feel a certain superiority to Blacks. On the other hand, the backlash is also well in place and not just among the local neighborhood population. There is definitely resentment on many levels by Blacks towards Latinos, that gets expressed often through anti-bilingual education type comments and sentiments. Its definitely a pecking order issue, which they of course do not address here, where society continues to pit one group against the other for supposedly scarce resources... It stands to reason, as born out in the study, that those (Latinos in this case) who have some sort of class or group consciousness do not have as much of a negative stereotype image of Blacks. Conversely it makes sense that those with delusions of "getting ahead" attempt to distance themselves all the more from their struggling neighbors as well as their own brothers - fellow Latinos.
--Naomi

----- Original Message -----

From: Peter Farruggio<mailto:pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>

To: 2language@yahoogroups.com<mailto:2language@yahoogroups.com>

Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 4:35 AM

Subject: [ca-resisters] Latino Immigrants With Negative Stereotypes of Black Americans



This area of research can have important implications for those of us

who organize Latino immigrants to fight for better schools in low

income neighborhoods.

Question: What role does US media and popular culture play in

propagating negative stereotypes throughout Latin America?


Mon Jul 10 07:20:32 2006 Pacific Time

Latino Immigrants Come to U.S. With Negative Stereotypes of

Black Americans, Study Shows

http://www.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/behold.pl?ascribeid=20060710.055316&time=07%2020%20PDT&year=2006&public=1<http://www.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/behold.pl?ascribeid=20060710.055316&time=07%2020%20PDT&year=2006&public=1>

DURHAM, N.C., July 10 (AScribe Newswire) -- Latinos bring

negative stereotypes about black Americans to the U.S. when they

immigrate and identify more with whites than blacks, according to a

study of the changing political dynamics in the South.


The research also found that living in the same neighborhoods

with black Americans seems to reinforce, rather than reduce, the

negative stereotypes Latino immigrants have of blacks, said Paula D.

McClain, a Duke University political science professor who is the

study's lead author.


McClain said the findings are significant because the South

has the largest population of blacks in the U.S. and has been defined

more than other regions along a black-white divide. How Latino

immigrants relate to blacks and whites -- and how those groups relate

to Latinos -- has implications for the social and political dynamic

of the region, she said.


"Given the increasing number of Latino immigrants in the

South and the possibility that over time their numbers might rival or

even surpass black Americans in the region, if large portions of

Latino immigrants maintain negative attitudes of black Americans,

where will this leave blacks?" the researchers wrote. "Will blacks

find that they must not only make demands on whites for continued

progress, but also mount a fight on another front against Latinos?"


In an interview, McClain added: "We're actually pretty

depressed about a lot of our findings."


The findings will be published in the August issue of the

Journal of Politics, which is already available online

( http://journalofpolitics.org/art68_3.html#a7<http://journalofpolitics.org/art68_3.html#a7>). The study was funded

by the Ford Foundation.


The study's co-authors are Niambi M. Carter, Victoria M.

DeFrancesco Soto and Monique L. Lyle of Duke; Jeffrey D. Grynaviski

of the University of Chicago; Shayla C. Nunnally of the University of

Connecticut; Thomas J. Scotto of West Virginia University; J. Alan

Kendrick of St. Augustine's College; and Gerald F. Lackey and Kendra

Davenport Cotton of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


The findings are based on a 2003 survey, conducted in English

and Spanish, of 500 Durham, N.C., residents, including 160 whites,

151 blacks and 167 Latinos. Durham was chosen for the pilot study

because North Carolina has the fastest-growing Latino population in

the country, and because Durham's black population includes residents

at all socioeconomic levels.


The goal was to understand how Latino immigration -- a

population largely new to the South in the past decade -- affects

group dynamics in the South, which has historically been defined by

the relationship between blacks and whites. The survey focused on a

range of social and political activities and attitudes, including

stereotypes each group holds about the other two.


Researchers found that 58.9 percent of Latino immigrants --

most Latinos in Durham are from Mexico -- feel that few or almost no

blacks are hard-working. About one-third, or 32.5 percent, of Latino

immigrants reported they feel few or almost no blacks are easy to get

along with. More than half of the Latino immigrants, or 56.9 percent,

feel that few or almost no blacks could be trusted.


Within the Latino immigrant population, researchers found,

more-educated Latinos have significantly fewer negative stereotypes,

and men have significantly more negative stereotypes.


"One might think that the cause of the Latinos' negative

opinions about blacks is the transmission of prejudice from Southern

whites, but our data do not support this notion," the researchers wrote.


White residents in Durham actually have a more positive view

of blacks, leading researchers to conclude that Latinos' negative

views were not adopted from whites. In the survey, only 9.3 percent

of whites surveyed indicate that few blacks are hard-working; only

8.4 percent believe few or almost no blacks are easy to get along

with; and only 9.6 percent feel that few or almost no blacks can be trusted.


The researchers also noted that if whites were the primary

influence on Latinos' stereotypes, Latinos would become more

prejudiced the longer they are in the U.S.; the findings do not

support that notion. The researchers also investigated whether

Latinos might be reciprocating the prejudice they sense from blacks;

again, the survey did not support this theory.


The survey showed that blacks view Latinos much more

favorably than Latinos view blacks. About 72 percent of blacks feel

most or almost all Latinos are hard-working, and 42.8 percent say

most or almost all Latinos are easy to get along with. About

one-third, or 32.6 percent, of blacks feel few or no Latinos could be trusted.


WHAT CAUSES THE LATINOS' STEREOTYPES?


The researchers concluded that Latino immigrants may bring

their feelings about the racial hierarchies in their own countries

with them to the U.S. The researchers noted that previous studies on

race and Latin America, especially Mexico, identify blacks as

"representing the bottom rungs of society."


The study also looked at the racial group with whom Latino

immigrants most identify. More than 78 percent feel they have the

most in common with whites, and 52.8 percent said they have the least

in common with blacks.


Whites do not feel the same connection to Latino immigrants.

Nearly half of whites -- 47.5 percent -- reported they have the least

in common with Latinos. Just 22.2 percent of whites see themselves as

having the most in common with Latinos, while 45.9 percent say they

have the most in common with blacks.


Among blacks, respondents are split -- 49.6 percent say

blacks have the most in common with Latinos, while 45.5 percent say

they have the most in common with whites.


The study did find that several factors do reduce

stereotypes. For instance, when Latinos have a sense of "linked fate"

with other Latinos -- or the sense that what happens to other Latinos

affects them -- they tend to have fewer stereotypes against blacks.


"The finding that these negative attitudes are modulated by a

sense of linked fate suggests possibilities for the formation of

connections to black Americans in the absence of the presence of an

extant American Latino community," the researchers wrote.


The researchers also noted that education and some types of

social interaction with blacks can reduce negative stereotypes among

Latinos. However, one type of social interaction -- living in the

same neighborhood -- "pushes them farther away from blacks and closer

to whites," the study said.


"These new Latino immigrants may behave in ways similar to

the Chinese in Mississippi in the mid-19th century, and the Cubans in

Miami in the mid-20th century -- identification with whites,

distancing themselves from blacks, and feeling no responsibility to

rectify the continuing inequalities of black Americans," the

researchers wrote.


EXPANDING THE STUDY


McClain noted that more research needs to be done to fully

understand these findings. Her research team plans to expand the

study to determine whether the Durham findings mirror Latino-black

relations in other Southern cities. In addition to re-surveying

Durham residents, her group plans to study Memphis, Tenn.;

Greensboro, N.C.; Greenville, S.C.; and Dalton, Ga. She recently

received a grant from the Russell Sage Foundation to survey three of

the cities and will seek funding from other sources to fund the

remaining two cities.


While the topic requires additional research, McClain said

the initial findings indicate that community leaders in cities with

burgeoning Latino immigrant populations must begin thinking through

how the different groups get along.


"Black and Latino leaders need to recognize that there is a

tremendous potential for conflict and that Latino immigrant attitudes

toward black Americans may be a part of that," she said. "There is

also a potential for a backlash against Latino immigrants from black

Americans."


- - - -


CONTACTS: Paula McClain can be reached for comment at

919-660-4303 or pmcclain@duke.edu<mailto:pmcclain@duke.edu>. For media assistance, contact

Kelly Gilmer, Duke University Office of News & Communications,

919-681-8065, kelly.gilmer@duke.edu<mailto:kelly.gilmer@duke.edu>.


NOTE TO EDITORS: A copy of the study is available in the

August issue of the Journal of Politics at

http://journalofpolitics.org/art68_3.html#a7<http://journalofpolitics.org/art68_3.html#a7>.


Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: