[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: [ARN-state] FairTest USA Today Column on State Graduation Exams


  • To: CA Resisters <ca-resisters@interversity.org>
  • Subject: Fwd: [ARN-state] FairTest USA Today Column on State Graduation Exams
  • From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:06:45 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=gptlxw/BJ5IlZjdSh5gdU48OiKksfyjpLbZdYVIHCgQ5pg5dww2XkCP4L8EEluVV; h=Received:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;



Begin forwarded message:

From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:31:24 AM US/Pacific
To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>, ARN State <ARN-state@yahoogroups.com>, CARE List <care@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [ARN-state] FairTest USA Today Column on State Graduation Exams
Reply-To: ARN-state@yahoogroups.com

This morning's USA Today, the nation's largest circulation daily,
features a response from Monty Neill to the paper's "stay the course"
editorial endorsing high school graduation exams.

To support the work that makes it possible to balance the testing
debate, please consider making a tax deductible contribution online at:

https://secure.entango.com/servlet/donate/MnrXjT8MQqk

or by sending a check to: FairTest, 342 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139



LET STUDENTS GRADUATE:
STATE TESTS UNFAIRLY PENALIZE BORDERLINE SENIORS; TRY OTHER ASSESSMENT
OPTIONS
USA Today Editorial Response -- July 25, 2006
by Monty Neill

Recent studies reinforce the conclusion that graduation tests increase
the dropout rate. The harder the test, the more kids drop out. Across
the USA, high-stakes tests push at least 40,000 young men and women out
of school each year.

Some say this is an acceptable price to pay for improving schools. But
denying borderline students the benefit of a diploma hurts both these
young people and our country. A teenager with a weak education and a
diploma can still get a job and become a contributing member of society.
Without a diploma, the constructive options are severely limited.

That leaves the question of whether high-stakes testing improves
learning for students who remain in school. Proponents claim that rising
scores on state exams prove the policy works. Unfortunately, those gains
largely stem from teachers drilling the narrow content of the state
tests. On broader measures, such as the Grade 12 National Assessment of
Educational Progress, reading and math scores have not budged.

Why the negative results? Teaching to graduation tests dumbs down
curriculum and instruction. Reading exams focus on easily testable
skills, not comprehension. Math tests emphasize routine procedures but
fail to tap the problem-solving abilities students really need. Writing
tests reduce that vital skill to cranking out a “five-paragraph essay” —
a format used only on standardized tests. As a result, many students do
not learn to think, apply knowledge, engage in research, write
substantial papers or speak coherently.

The only people helped by imposing these damaging exams are the
politicians who pretend that they are doing something cheap and simple
to improve educational quality.

A better alternative is to strengthen educators' assessment skills. With
smaller class sizes and deeper professional development, teachers can
provide more meaningful evidence of student achievement to determine
readiness for graduation. College admissions officers and employers know
this information is more useful than any test score is.

Improving classroom-assessment quality might sound like a more complex
route to school reform. But it is much more likely to be successful than
the failed path of one-size-fits-all graduation exams.

Monty Neill is executive director of the National Center for Fair & Open
Testing (FairTest), based in Cambridge, Mass

http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20060725/oppose25.art.htm

The USA Today editorial to which Monty is responding is online at:

http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20060725/edit25.art.htm





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/SktRrD/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/xYTolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARN-state/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ARN-state-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/







Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: