[ Author Prev][ Author Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Author Index][ Thread Index]
House Ed & Labor pushes forward on NCLB
- To: ca-resisters@interversity.org
- Subject: House Ed & Labor pushes forward on NCLB
- From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:11:18 -0700
House Lawmakers Push for No Child Left Behind Legislation by August
By: Stephen Langel
CongressNow Staff
Thursday, July 05, 2007 4:33 PM
A bipartisan group of House lawmakers is making a push to mark up No Child
Left Behind Act legislation before the August recess with hopes of
reauthorizing President Bush's landmark education reforms before they expire
at the end of September.
House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, Buck McKeon
(R-Calif), the ranking member of committee, along with Reps. Dale Kildee
(D-Mich.) and Michael Castle (R-Del.), the chairman and ranking members of
Education and Labor's subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary and
Secondary Education, are leading efforts to reauthorize the education
initiative.
Currently staff from both sides of the aisle are negotiating the final
details of the bill's legislative language that will likely be released
within the week as a precursor to a mark up, sources say.
NCLB sets federal performance standards for schools with a goal of having
all children reading at their grade level by 2014. Some lawmakers have
expressed concern that the current legislation forces federal mandates on
local schools with little flexibility; while others have complained the call
for an education overhaul has not been backed up with increased federal
spending.
In hopes of addressing those concerns, Miller has sent out a memo to various
groups of lawmakers, including House freshman members, to get their views on
several key NCLB issues. "Your feedback on these changes is key to the
reauthorization process," Miller wrote in an internal memo sent out last
month that was obtained by CongressNow.
According to the June memo, Miller requested comments on using growth
models, which track individual students' progress over several years as
opposed to the current approach that compares grade levels' performance.
Miller also sought feedback on allowing states to use measures other than
test scores to evaluate student learning and school performance with an eye
toward improving "fairness, validity, reliability, and appropriateness of
tests" for students, particularly special education students and those for
who English is a second language.
The paper also sought comments on how to develop "appropriate and flexible"
interventions for schools falling below minimum NCLB standards, how to
improve teacher training and performance, along with how to ensure increased
funding for the program.
For his part, McKeon is confident that reauthorization will take place soon.
An aide to the congressman said staffers are "certainly optimistic that we
can get something done" by August.
Currently, the lawmakers are wrestling with several issues, including how to
incorporate new performance measures, ensuring increased use of supplemental
services and providing greater flexibility for state and local entities' use
of NCLB funds, the aide added.
Lawmakers are particularly interested in incorporating so-called growth
models to measure performance. Negotiators are also pushing to ensure that
students have greater access to supplemental services, such as free
tutoring. The lawmakers want to include language to ensure earlier parental
notification of these options, along with clearer language about when that
service is available.
Finally, negotiations are ongoing about how to give state and local entities
flexibility in transferring NCLB money between different programs, including
for technology classroom technology, teacher quality and safe and drug free
school programs. Currently school districts and states have flexibility in
how they use 50 percent of those funds, but some lawmakers, including
McKeon, want that increased to 100 percent, the aide said.
Bob Schaeffer, public education director for the National Center for Fair &
Open Testing (FairTest), told CongressNow using growth models, moving beyond
standardized test scores to measure success, addressing special need
students and hiring qualified teachers have bipartisan interest among
lawmakers, especially freshman members.
However, the House's push to address so many issues in such a short period
of time has some advocates concerned.
Getting it right is more important than getting it done fast, said Scott
Palmer, a partner at Holland & Knight, which represents state education
officials. It will be a "real challenge" for lawmakers to get
reauthorization by the end of the year with new innovative measures, he
said.
Schaeffer is also concerned that lawmakers are rushing legislation. He said.
FairTest "strongly opposes efforts to ramrod a bill through the House,"
without debate and amendments on the complexities of it.
Schaeffer and Palmer say they are skeptical that the bill will be
reauthorized before the end of the current fiscal year. With the 2008
elections looming, they say, Democrats do not want to give Bush a domestic
policy victory, while lawmakers may be reluctant to back controversial
legislation a little more than a year before they face voters, Schaeffer
said.
One possibility is that Congress could pass an extension of NCLB with minor
changes to performance measures, such as adding growth models, Schaeffer and
Palmer said.
But the McKeon aide dismissed such speculation insisting a full
reauthorization would occur.
Meanwhile, the Senate is farther behind in reauthorizing NCLB with the
Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee just beginning to
weigh in on the legislation.
Post a Message to ca-resisters:
|