[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Democratic leaders may "rebrand" their unpopular product


  • To: ARN state <ARN-state@egroups.com>, arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com, North Dakota Study Group <ndsgroup@yahoogroups.com>, CA Resisters <ca-resisters@interversity.org>
  • Subject: Fwd: Democratic leaders may "rebrand" their unpopular product
  • From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:13:25 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=W9JRfbqQ0AR40KIaIvIAKa9J4Wz6g6w/mENOuQdJ8dtgHeRuFtpnM0r7fKqVNWpu; h=Received:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From:To:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;

Begin forwarded message:

From: James Crawford <jwcrawford@COMPUSERVE.COM>

Date: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:45:57 PM US/Pacific

To: ELLADVOC@asu.edu

Subject: Democratic leaders may "rebrand" their unpopular product

Reply-To: James Crawford <jwcrawford@COMPUSERVE.COM>

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_9/news/19458-1.html

NCLB to Get Left Behind?

July 19, 2007

By Steven T. Dennis, Roll Call Staff

President Bush’s signature No Child Left Behind law is about to get an
overhaul courtesy of the Democratic Congress, and the name itself could be
one of the casualties.

Rep. Dale Kildee (D-Mich.), the 16-term veteran on the Education and Labor
Committee, said he was the first to propose renaming the measure, noting that
the education bill has been renamed every time it has been reauthorized.

The name change will be made “not just for the sake of cosmetics but will
reflect the changes we are making,” Kildee said. “We’re trying to come up
with a bill that’s more acceptable to the education community.” A new name
“would communicate the fact that we are listening to them and making
substantive changes.”

Kildee said whatever name lawmakers end up with, it should include the word
“growth” because the new legislation will transition to a new scoring system
that tracks the growth of individual students, addressing a key complaint
about the current standards, which grade schools based on succeeding groups
of students rather than measuring growth over the course of the year.

“I believe No Child Left Behind has lost so much credibility that it needs to
be rebranded,” House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) said this week.
Clyburn said the law needs to be overhauled to ensure fairness among
districts and states, complaining that the law encourages states to lowball
standards to meet yearly improvement goals, while states with higher
standards, like South Carolina, are punished.

House Education and Labor Chairman George Miller (D-Calif.) is working with
ranking member Howard McKeon (R-Calif.) to craft a bill with strong
bipartisan support, but they have to face concerns from both the right and
left flanks, with teacher’s unions and others unhappy about some provisions
and conservatives concerned about federal meddling in local affairs.

“Right now we are working together in good faith,” McKeon said. “George
Miller really wants to get it done.” McKeon strongly supports the law but
says it needs to be tweaked to deal with inequities. Changes in the works
include making accommodations for schools with large numbers of English as a
Second Language students and special education students.

Schools with large numbers of students transitioning in and out of the school
over a year are at a disadvantage under the current system, McKeon and others
acknowledge. “That’s what we’ve been working on trying to fix,” McKeon said.
“It’s an example of how the process is supposed to work. Nothing is perfect.”

McKeon said he hopes the issue won’t devolve into partisan warfare the way
immigration did. “My feeling is that education shouldn’t be partisan. If we
get it done right, we should have a majority of both caucuses. I’m hoping
that people won’t get locked in concrete over something that has got to be
done.”

But the makeover comes as Bush’s clout on Capitol Hill has hit a new low,
with some Republicans warning that No Child Left Behind could be a repeat of
the meltdown on immigration legislation, where Bush’s own party abandoned
him.

NCLB faces a revolt from some leading Republicans, including House Minority
Whip Roy Blunt (Mo.), House Chief Deputy Minority Whip Eric Cantor (Va.) and
numerous rank-and-file Members.

“My constituents hate it,” said Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.), who has
authored a bill turning NCLB into a block grant program, attracting 60
Republican co-sponsors so far. “People are teaching to the test, there are
all kinds of federal mandates, the costs aren’t fully reimbursed and it is
leading to soft discrimination because schools know which students are a
danger to their meeting [the standards] and they encourage them to leave.”

Hoekstra argued that the rigidity of the federal standards penalize schools
that attract large numbers of special education students, for example. “I
think it’s very, very hard to be in Washington, D.C., and design a system for
every school district in America.”

Hoekstra said Republicans are no longer willing to give Bush the benefit of
the doubt.

“The president is totally out of touch,” Hoekstra said. “Most Republicans
supported this issue because they wanted to support a new president, not
because it’s what they really believed.”

Hoekstra also noted that there has been significant opposition among key
constituencies in local districts.

“This is the one program I can go to my traditional Democratic constituency
groups and say I voted against and I get a standing ovation,” he said.

Kildee said another obstacle for the bill is that many freshmen on both sides
of the aisle campaigned against NCLB.

“The freshmen are very concerned about No Child Left Behind so I think we
have to make substantive changes but still have standards,” Kildee said.

Democrats also want a commitment from Bush that he will pony up more cash for
the program next year. Democrats have estimated that Bush and the GOP-led
Congress have underfunded the program by $55 billion to date.

“One [problem] is the funding and the other is the policy,” said Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen (Md.). “The key is
to make it clear to people that we are changing it in some significant ways,”
regardless of what it’s called.

Senators are also getting into the naming game. Sen. Joe Lieberman (ID-Conn.)
made his bid Wednesday, proposing the “All Students Can Achieve Act,” which
would also move toward growth scoring and has the backing of Sens. Mary
Landrieu (D-La.) and Norm Coleman (R-Minn.). Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) is
expected to unveil his version of the legislation after the August recess.
The name has not yet been released.

Vote in the National Cheney Impeachment Poll

http://www.usalone.com/blogvoices.php?Cheney%20Impeachment%3F

Add this text to your own email and blog signatures!


Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: