[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: [ARN-state] More on "100% Solution" - Weighted Student Funding


  • To: CA Resisters <ca-resisters@interversity.org>
  • Subject: Fwd: [ARN-state] More on "100% Solution" - Weighted Student Funding
  • From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:12:31 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=L92zvCCMqpSbl+P7MykzxsOuaCzu/lytfpZSgcSxrnlcBgoe2wzbekzdocqCkUgk; h=Received:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;



Begin forwarded message:

From: Peter Campbell <campbellp@mail.montclair.edu>
Date: Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:15:54 PM US/Pacific
To: ARN State <ARN-state@yahoogroups.com>, ARN-L List <arn-l@interversity.org>, arn2-strategy > <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [ARN-state] More on "100% Solution" - Weighted Student Funding
Reply-To: ARN-state@yahoogroups.com

The authors of the so-called "100% Solution" ask, "How should
different student characteristics be weighted?" They ask this in
response to their proposal that "hard-to-educate" (sic) children
receive more funds. But how do you determine how much each child
gets? The authors admit, "WSF (weighted student funding) cannot work
if there is not an accurate picture of the student population of
every school. With more money flowing to students with greater needs,
there will be great temptation for schools to exaggerate their
students’ disadvantages. To ensure a fair process, the school should
not have responsibility for classifying students."

As one way to crack this inherently corrupted nut, the authors sing
the praises of the marketplace:

---snip--

One approach is to set weights over time based on the “marketplace”
for students that are weighted. In a comprehensive WSF system such as
we propose, weights can (and should) be established such that hard-to-
educate children become desirable for schools to enroll. Knowing that
student performance standards must be reached, principals should find
the weight for an at-risk child sufficient to make that child an
asset to the school. Principals should seek out the children who
bring with them weights that are at least sufficient to enable the
school to meet achievement standards. Just as the free market sets
prices for goods and services, the market for hard-to-educate
children can determine their weighting. Principals and schools should
seek to enroll hard-to-educate children because they know that with
the money accompanying the child they can show improvement trends and
reach performance levels. If this doesn’t happen, the district or
state should adjust weights until it does.

--snip--

So let me get this straight: under this proposal, principals will go
out of their ways to find the most challenging "hard-to-educate
children" because these children will bring more dollars with them.

But wait a minute: these extra dollars are supposed to be used to
educate these so-called "hard-to-educate children." If that's the
case, then it's a wash. In other words, there would be no incentive
whatsoever to enroll these children. It would take more money to
educate them. The principals would get more money to educate them.
The principals would spend the extra money on educating them.

Or not.

It would most definitely be an incentive for principals to enroll
these children if they got the extra money to educate them and then
spend the extra funds on whatever they chose: a new football field, a
new air-conditioned teachers' lounge, a new set of textbooks from
McGraw-Hill.

Ironically, in pointing out the possibility of corruption within the
system, the authors have provided a new channel for corruption in a
plan ostensibly designed to prevent it.

A disproportionate percentage of these "hard-to-educate children" are
black. A call to the marketplace to cure what ails them calls to mind
a different kind of marketplace at a different time. But this
marketplace was also designed to cure what ailed them. In both eras,
their fates lay in the hands of the highest bidders.

---
Peter Campbell

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/xYTolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARN-state/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ARN-state-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/







Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: