[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
Lobbying Congress, July 10-12
- To: 2language@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Lobbying Congress, July 10-12
- From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:51:50 -0700
James Crawford is the founder of the Institute for Language and
Education Policy
http://www.elladvocates.org/
From: James Crawford <jwcrawford@COMPUSERVE.COM>
Some Institute members have been discussing a concerted attempt to
meet with members of Congress (and/or their education staffers) the
second week of July here in Washington to discuss NCLB
reauthorization. Likely days would be Tuesday through Thursday, July
10-12. If you are interested in participating, please let me know.
Things appear to be moving on a fast track in the House Education
and Labor Committee, which could well "mark up" -- i.e., consider
amendments and vote on -- a Democratic proposal for reauthorization
that week or shortly thereafter. Chairman George Miller is
reportedly eager to move quickly before staunch opponents of NCLB
can get their act together. For the past few weeks his staff has
been working on a proposal, yet to be unveiled, but we're likely to
see something soon.
From what I hear, many changes are under consideration -- growth
models, safe harbor provisions, added funding for developing better
ELL assessments, etc. -- but it's unlikely Miller will propose any
fundamental changes in the test-and-punish approach to
accountability. The law is quite unpopular with some Democrats,
including House freshmen (and -women) who attacked NCLB in their
electoral campaigns. But they need plenty of encouragement to go up
against a powerful member like Miller.
Meanwhile, numerous conservative Republicans are pushing to
dismantle NCLB and give states education funds with few strings
attached. But others, led by the ranking Republican on Ed & Labor,
Buck McKeon of California, are siding with the Bush administration's
stay-the-course position.
On the Senate side, things are moving somewhat slower, although
Chairman Kennedy (HELP Committee) seems to have the same general
orientation as Miller at this point. Democratic critics seem a bit
more organized in the Senate. Just today Sen. Russ Feingold of
Wisconsin and five others wrote to Secretary Spellings calling for
fundamental changes in "the unworkable aspects of NCLB, particularly
the rigid, yearly testing requirements and the punitive sanctions
structure." I've posted their excellent letter at:
http://www.elladvocates.org/documents/nclb/Feingold_Letter_June_07.pdf
In any case, this would be an excellent time to meet with members of
Congress, whether or not they are on the education committees.
Unfortunately, the Institute has limited resources -- i.e., no
travel money. But if you can join us in DC, I'll try to make your
stay enjoyable and productive. If not, I'd encourage you to meet
with your representatives back home during their next two holidays
(July 2-6 and August 6-September 3).
Again, I look forward to hearing from anyone who's available to
participate in our lobby week. Thanks.
Jim Crawford
Post a Message to ca-resisters:
|