[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: [ARN-state] more on myth of Texas education reform


  • To: CA Resisters <ca-resisters@interversity.org>, George Miller <george.miller@mail.house.gov>, Miller Alice Cain <alice.cain@mail.house.gov>
  • Subject: Fwd: [ARN-state] more on myth of Texas education reform
  • From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:01:42 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=AhKzCuUyLUfbIwmh0jO8o0ouJLnsGLSPSqJyaV7RZei8whC+HtNXhYD/id6aou/G; h=Received:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From:To:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Monty Neill" <monty@fairtest.org>

Date: Mon Jun 2, 2008 2:07:23 PM US/Pacific

To: "arn2-strategy" <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>, "ARN-L"
<arn-l@interversity.org>, <ARN-state@yahoogroups.com>,
<care@yahoogroups.com>, <ndsgroup@yahoogroups.com>

Subject: [ARN-state] more on myth of Texas education reform

Reply-To: ARN-state@yahoogroups.com

In January, Linda McNeil and colleagues published "Avoidable losses: high
stakes accountability and the dropout crisis,' (summary and link to article
is at
http://www.fairtest.org/texas-accountability-system-causes-avoidable-losse)

Now Linda Darling-Hammond and Julian Vasquez Heilig (a coauthor on the McNeil
paper) have published "Accountablity Texas-style:The progress and learning of
urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context," in the June issue
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis - which unlike the McNeil et al
paper is not available free on the web. These are complementary studies.

The study of one district documented significant increases in retention in
grade 9 (grade 10 is tested, 9 is not). Up to 30% were retained; of those
"only 12% ever took the TAAS, and only 8% passed it." As in the McNeil study,
most of those 'withdrawn' (up to 40% of a cohort) never were labeled as
dropouts. Students simply disappeared from the rolls with no attached data
codes to explain why they 'left.' This study suggests that of the leavers,
only 8% transfer to other schools.

The fraudulent result was a soaring graduation rate, though the
authors' analysis showed only 1/3 of a cohort actually graduated in 5 years
or less. African Americans, Latinos and ELL's had the lowest
completion rates. In addition to improved official graduation rates,
accountability rankings also improved as youth "disappeared." The authors
note that the state failed to provide adequate resources to the schools,
imposed the accountability requirements, and in effect the "onus of
accountability fell on [students] and their schools, instead of the state."

SAT-9 tests and it Spanish complement, Aprenda, were also administered in the
disrict. Averaging scores from grades 3-10, SAT-9 scores were flat then fell,
while TAAS scores rose. Far more students, especially African Americans and
Latinos, were excluded from TAAS, a high stakes test, than from SAT-9, a
low-stakes test. On SAT-9, the racial score gap did not close, though it did
on the TAAS from 98-99 to 01-02. And those who were excluded from the
EnglishTAAS had lower scores on the SAT-9. Low-scorers also tended have
newer, less experienced teachers.

This study covers years prior to NCLB, but when the model for NCLB was in
full force in Texas. The accountability system did not help low-income and
minority-group children, but it helped the state pretend its policies were
helpful. The mechanism was 'game-playing' by school authorities. Those
actions that are harmful to students, from driving them out to reducing
teaching to test prep, are not defensible. But it makes no sense to construct
an accountability system that uses only test scores as the measure and allows
all sorts of ways to drive students out, and then blame educators for
effectively doing what the accountability system has pushed them to do -
teach to the test and find ways to count only those whose scores make the
school or district look good. The accountability system and the testing
system on which it is based must be overhauled, at state and federal levels.

Monty

Monty Neill, Ed.D.

Deputy Director

FairTest

342 Broadway

Cambridge, MA 02139

617-864-4810 x 101; fax 617-497-2224

monty@fairtest.org

http://www.fairtest.org

Donate: https://secure.entango.com/servlet/donate/MnrXjT8MQqk

__._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)

Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully
Featured

Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Vote in the National Cheney Impeachment Poll

http://www.usalone.com/blogvoices.php?Cheney%20Impeachment%3F

Add this text to your own email and blog signatures!


Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: