[ Author Prev][ Author Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Author Index][ Thread Index]
Re: Bersin-sac bee article-
- To: ca-resisters@interversity.org
- Subject: Re: Bersin-sac bee article-
- From: Susan Harman <susanharman@igc.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:55:50 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=Prtw995CmGhwASklxJuAC4CZmf6JmTco6WIOCA6/UNdD/DXEc+XeR4EgK9TBmRiO; h=Received:Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- In-reply-to: <6.2.5.6.2.20060311031007.02f252c0@cal.berkeley.edu>
I just got around to watching the Enron video last night. Oh my god.
The bottom line is they never, ever asked whether what they were doing
was right or wrong, whether it was harming anyone. Morality was not a
factor. Just Will it make money. Why hasnt CA sued to get it all back?
The evidence is shocking: eg, traders telling power companies to find
an excuse to shut down for a period of several hours so they can hike
prices outrageously. All on tape!
Susan
Begin forwarded message:
From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:22:18 AM US/Pacific
To: arn-l@interversity.org
Subject: [ca-resisters] Bersin-sac bee article-
Reply-To: ca-resisters@interversity.org
The response here is "It's all legal!" Just like the neo-cons, Bersin
apparently assumes we're all too stupid to see the moral and ethical
aspects of his situation. He was an employee of a school district,
which has restrictions on his public activities as their
representative. So, he uses corporate foundation funding, from very
political entities, to do the things that he wants to do in order to
avoid review by his employers. Now what would Bersin have said to a
San Diego teacher who tried to do the same thing, that is who
attempted to speak for the school district or a school at a public
event?
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/education/story/14228304p-
15051759c.html
Education nominee hits snag
Alan Bersin's critics question San Diego fund's expenses.
By Todd Milbourn -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 am PST Friday, March 10, 2006
Story appeared on Page A3 of The Bee
On the eve of confirmation hearings for his place on the California
State Board of Education less than three weeks away, Alan Bersin is
facing questions about expenditures from an educational fund he
oversaw while superintendent of San Diego schools.
A copy of a draft report from an internal audit, dated Nov. 1, 2005,
and obtained by The Bee, highlights questionable record-keeping and
spending from the fund, including $35,476 for meals and $3,801 for
alcoholic beverages over a seven-year period.
Bersin, whom Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger named secretary of education,
labeled the draft report as an attempt to thwart his confirmation and
settle "old political scores."
"Every one of the expenses was approved as being in accordance with
purposes of the fund," said Bersin in a telephone interview Thursday.
"This was all done in terms of supporting educational reform,
supporting the team effort. And it was fully disclosed."
The fund in question - the superintendent's fund for innovation - was
created in 1998, shortly after Bersin became superintendent of the
state's second-largest school district. The fund was a partnership
between the school district and the nonprofit San Diego Foundation,
which gave Bersin latitude to direct expenditures. Bersin has
described the fund as support for new programs in the San Diego
schools.
The foundation collected money for the fund through private donations
from groups such as the Walton Family Foundation, Wells Fargo and the
J. Dallas & Mary H. Clark Fund.
Bersin often used the fund to reimburse his travel and entertainment
expenses so the district wouldn't have to. The San Diego school board
was not involved in the fund's creation and did not have oversight
over its spending. That led school board members to question the
foundation's activities.
Bersin spent $574,733 through the fund during his tenure, according to
the report. The report calls into question about $44,871 of that,
including: $471 to attend President Bush's inauguration; $160 for the
Union of Pan Asian Communities annual fundraiser dinner; and $500 to
Nice Guys Inc. of San Diego for an advertisement in a program booklet
at an awards ceremony.
Bersin said the money was well spent, validated by improved test
scores among San Diego students. Between 2002 and 2004, scores for
Latino and African American students on the state's Academic
Performance Index rose 8 percent and 6 percent, respectively.
He said the fund allowed him to bring in consultants, offer a signing
bonus for a communications director and pay the commuting expenses for
Anthony Alvarado, the San Diego district's chancellor of instruction
who commuted from New York for a year and spearheaded aggressive
reforms of classroom instruction that upset teachers unions.
"I don't think anyone, friend or foe alike, would say the changes
weren't dramatic" and for the better, he said.
The review of the fund was commissioned in August by San Diego school
board member Mitz Lee, a longtime critic of Bersin, who as a former
federal prosecutor had no formal education experience when he took
over the district in 1998. Lee said she was concerned that
expenditures weren't approved by the school board, leaving potential
for abuse.
"To me, it's all about the board exercising due diligence on financial
affairs of the district," she said Thursday.
Lee said she also was concerned that the foundation hasn't disclosed a
contributor of more than $207,000.
"What if those people have business or any conflicts of interest with
the district?" Lee asked. Bob Kelly, executive director of the San
Diego Foundation, couldn't be reached for comment Thursday.
Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute on Philanthropy,
a charity watchdog in Chicago, said giving a superintendent his own
fund is a recipe for trouble. The $45,000 in expenses questioned in
the draft report works out to about $6,000 a year.
"I'm not that surprised to see these problems happening," Borochoff
said. "If you're a superintendent and you want to buy alcohol for an
event or go to the inauguration, the school district has mechanisms to
prevent that. This gives him too much discretion beyond what his job
would ordinarily allow."
Hearings on Bersin's nomination to the state board are scheduled for
later this month. The fund is on the agenda Tuesday for a closed-door
session of the San Diego Unified School District, said Steven Baratte,
the district's spokesman. The confirmation hearing is set for March > 29.
Post a Message to ca-resisters:
|