[ Author Prev][ Author Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Author Index][ Thread Index]
Fwd: Over 100,000 March in Chicago to Protest Immigration Reform Bill, Tuesday, March 14th, 2006
- To: 2language@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Fwd: Over 100,000 March in Chicago to Protest Immigration Reform Bill, Tuesday, March 14th, 2006
- From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:53:11 -0800
- Cc: ca-resisters@interversity.org
Over 100,000 March in Chicago to Protest
Immigration Reform Bill in One of Biggest Pro-Immigrant Rallies in U.S. History
Tuesday, March 14th, 2006
<http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/14/1456247>http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/14/1456247
Over 100,000 marchers took to the streets of
Chicago last Friday to fight a bill that would
rewrite the nation's immigration laws. The march
marked one of the biggest pro-immigrant rallies
in U.S. history. We discuss the implications of
the bill and the demonstration with a member of
one of the many organizations that spearheaded
the event. [includes rush transcript]
The political debate over immigration reform
continues to heat up across the country
following the recent passage of a bill by the
U.S. House of Representatives. The Senate will
debate the bill later this month.
Hundreds of thousands of marchers took to the
streets of Chicago last Friday to fight the bill
that would drastically strengthen immigration
enforcement, including extending a fence along
the Mexican border and severe punishment for
those who aid undocumented workers.
The mostly Latino marchers crammed the streets
carrying signs saying for example "No human
being is illegal" and "we are not criminals."
Critics say the Sensenbrenner bill would turn
millions of undocumented workers into felons for
crossing the border without permission
Police estimate 100,000 marchers participated,
making it one of the biggest pro-immigrant
rallies in U.S. history, according to national
advocates. However organizers estimate the
numbers were as many as half a million and
newspapers reports varied in that range.
Last Tuesday thousands of immigrants rallied
against the bill outside the U.S. Capitol. More
action is expected to come across the country as
the bill is debated in Congress.
Marchers in Chicago on Friday had the support of
local politicians. U.S. Democratic Congressman
Luis Gutierrez said in a speech, "This is our
country, and this is where we will stay."
Democrat Governor Blagojevich addressed the
crowd in Spanish, saying, "You are not
criminals, You are workers." Longtime Mayor
Richard Daley also pledged support.
Abel Nunez, associate director of Centro Romero,
a community-based organization that serves the
refugee immigrant population on the northeast side of Chicago.
RUSH TRANSCRIPT
AMY GOODMAN: We are joined now in Chicago studio
by Abel Nunez, associate director of one of the
many groups that spearheaded the event. Centro
Romero is a community-based organization that
serves the refugee immigrant population in the
northeast side of Chicago. We welcome you to Democracy Now!, Abel Nunez.
ABEL NUNEZ: Good morning.
AMY GOODMAN: This has gotten almost no attention
in this country. Massive protest. Did you expect
the numbers of people who protested on Friday?
ABEL NUNEZ: Actually, yes. I think the
organizers were the only ones that really
believed the turnout was going to be that big. I
think the rest of ? you know, we?re very much a
silent, invisible, marginalized community, but I
think the organizers had a feeling that it was going to be a huge march.
AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about exactly why people took to the streets?
ABEL NUNEZ: I think that there is a feeling
that, you know, there are laws coming that are
putting people between a rock and a hard place,
and they have no place to go, unfortunately.
They have nothing to lose. A lot of people that
are undocumented feel fear about coming out, and
in past that?s why they haven't really
demonstrated. But now, they feel like they have
nothing to lose, that for the first time this
country is telling them: you are not wanted. I
mean, it?s not about just not being able to
adjust your status. It?s now about: we want you out.
AMY GOODMAN: Talk about where the legislation is
right now. Passed by the House, but not by the Senate?
ABEL NUNEZ: Correct. Actually right now the
Senate Judiciary Committee is discussing their
version of it. It is the time when I think the
leadership of the Senate wants a vote on a
specific bill by the 27th of this month. So,
grassroots movements are mobilizing to ensure
that the Senate hears -- not only sees the show
of marches on the street, but also, you know,
they hear from voters that this is not the
America that we want. And I think that during
this time we are trying to mobilize again people
to send in letters, call in to the Senate. It
appears that if something happens, it will be
somewhat different than the House bill that was
approved, Sensenbrenner HR 4437.
AMY GOODMAN: We are talking to Abel Nunez, who?s
with Centro Romero, a community-based group in
Chicago, one of the organizers of the mass
protest on Friday there. Last week in our
headlines, we read that the Senate Judiciary
Committee is considering a law that would
classify social workers who feed and house
undocumented workers as human traffickers. The
ACLU criticizing the bill, saying it gives
extraordinary powers to detain non-citizens
indefinitely without meaningful review. It will
potentially place many non-citizens in a legal
black hole that subjects them to a life sentence
after having served a criminal sentence or, in
some cases, without ever having been convicted
of a crime. Can you just go through the
legislation and what is being considered now?
ABEL NUNEZ: Correct. The House bill, 4437,
served as launching point for the Senate.
Senator Specter basically introduced a version,
his version, of the bill to discuss on the
Senate subcommittee, and it took a lot of the
border enforcement. The only difference with his
bill is that he did add what fellow Republican
Party ? is a controversial guest worker program
without the possibility of ever -- of
citizenship or a path to citizenship. And at
this moment they are being discussed. Senator
Durbin is part of that committee, our senator
here in Illinois. He has been a champion of the
immigrant fight, and the different forces are
trying to ensure that if any bill passes the
Senate, it?s more of a balanced effect, instead
of -- and not only an enforcement bill.
AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about the wall?
ABEL NUNEZ: Yes. On the HR 4437, one of the
provisions is that a wall be constructed on the
southern border between Mexico and the United
States. And this is somehow, according to the
bill, would prevent immigrants from coming. I
think that misses the point, and it doesn't
really address the real issues as to why people
are coming to this country. And I think that the
facts show that this country needs the immigrant
labor force. You know, the globalization
factors, some factors that we, as an immigrant
community, have no control over, are pushing the
demand for this labor. So, I think that the wall
is an attempt to kind of put a facade of
security, given our current environment of
terrorism and protectionism that we are living
in in this country, but in reality, it will do
nothing to stem the flow of immigration, and it
does nothing for the more than 11 million
undocumented immigrants that are here in this country working.
AMY GOODMAN: Where does due process fit into this picture?
ABEL NUNEZ: Well, I think that?s what they are
taking out. I think, you know, their mode of
thinking is that they need to expedite -- they
need to give powers to law enforcement to
expedite removal of this country and one of the
laws -- the laws that have been put in place
actually have taken a lot of due process and
made it much more easier for border agents and
immigration officials to deport immigrants
immediately without giving them due process. I
think that really goes against the tradition of
this country, about giving people an opportunity to expose their case.
AMY GOODMAN: Abel Nunez, what are you proposing
as an alternative immigration plan?
ABEL NUNEZ: Yeah, I think if we are really
discussing about true immigration reform, one,
it has to address the 11 million undocumented
immigrants living and working in the United
States. We need to find a way to legalize their
status. Two, we need to create a program by
which we address the flow of immigrants that
will continue to come into this country in a way
that?s safe, in a way to regulate their passage.
And third, I think that we need to look at also
the waiting lines that exist for family members
to petition other family members; I mean, people
here who are citizens are petitioning family
members, and it?s taking, in some cases, twelve
years before a visa is available to them. I
think that the system is broken. It doesn't
truly address the current needs of this country,
and if we are talking about immigration reform,
we really have to address -- we have to approach
it from, you know, from a holistic approach, instead of just enforcement.
AMY GOODMAN: Abel Nunez, on that note, I want to
thank you very much for joining us. He is with
the Centro Romero, a community-based group in
Chicago. And we?ll certainly continue to cover this issue.
Post a Message to ca-resisters:
|