[ Author Prev][ Author Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Author Index][ Thread Index]
Fwd: great job mikey
- To: ca-resisters@interversity.org
- Subject: Fwd: great job mikey
- From: Rich Gibson <rgibson@pipeline.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:35:43 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=pipeline.com; b=FETH0u2w9XeJdFKnCsTv5y73BiqcGmEZSyWotT/ztsB18sExB+zuGLx6lL6S1/Cl; h=Received:Message-Id:X-Sender:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Mike McCarthy's piece below only begins to touch on the truly vicious
things Alan Bersin did to kids, teachers, some administrators, and many
community people in San Diego. McCarthy does not, for example, go into the
flatly racist and anti-working class aspects of Bersin's efforts. Those who
believe in the political process might want to try to cut off his appointment.
I note, however, that the San Diego Education Association did virtually
nothing about Bersin's activities, and teachers continued to proctor not
only the Big Tests, but to implement his "Blueprint," throughout his tenure
here. At some point, people become, not what they say they are, but what
they do.
California's schools are widely (and correctly, I think) seen as among the
worst in the US, if not the worst. Bersin managed to make one of those
school systems even worse than it was when he showed up.
best r
Michael MacCarthy <mmwrites@san.rr.com> wrote:
3/19/06
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the Union-Tribune Editorial Board,
Pasted in below is my Op-Ed submission in response to Ms. Nakamura's
"letter to the editor" ("A Full Disclosure on the Superintendent's Fund",
3/18, letters section).
In the interests of fairness and balance, I hope you will see fit to
publish this piece.
Many thanks.
Mike MacCarthy
President
Voters For Truth in Education
San Diego, CA 92111
(858) 715-9831
<mailto:mmwrites@san.rr.com>mmwrites@san.rr.com
Whining & Crying by Mr. Bersin and His Apologists
by Mike MacCarthy
Re "A Full Disclosure on the Superintendent's Fund" by Katherine Nakamura
(3/18, U-T Letters Section). Don't you just love it when bullies gets a
dose of their own medicine? Like in "Christmas Story" when 10-year-old
Ralphy finally gets so fed up with two upper-class tormentors who make
his life and that of his friends and younger brother a daily nightmare,
he beats the living daylights out of both bullies. Remember how those
grade school tyrants reacted when Ralph's mother finally broke up the
fight? They whined and cried like little babies.
Alan Bersin and his supporters both in San Diego and Sacramento remind me
of typical schoolyard bullies. Remember how Mr. Bersin and his new San
Diego City Schools (SDCS) administration told city school stakeholders
who disagreed with new top-down policies against students, parents,
administrators, teachers, and non-certified personnel, "Go ahead, make my
day. I'm a lawyer and know exactly what to do with lawsuits." Sounds
like bully talk to me.
Remember how the Bersin administration violated federal and state law
with respect to how they were running the 1998 Prop MM campaign, and how
they settled for a $10,000 fine, and then went on violating the law
despite having signed a document saying they would not? Remember how the
state sued SDCS because they were routinely violating the law with
respect to special education students? Remember how the Bersin
administration had policemen summarily escort 15 principals and
administrators out of their schools in 1999 and then dragged out the
lawsuit filed by these district employees until 2005, forcing them to
borrow hundreds of thousands of dollars for legal costs to defend their
rights as American citizens--despite the fact that SDCS had clearly
violated their rights (that's what the judge said)? Sounds like the
deeds of bullies to me.
Remember how the Bersin administration turned loose its legal thugs
against the Title I parents of the District Advisory Council (DAC), and
then gutted that leadership on legal technicalities because the DAC had
the unmitigated gall to file a lawsuit against SDCS for violating Title I
parents rights (a lawsuit the state eventually agreed with)? Remember
how a regular Bersin apologist and president of the city school board
used SDCS emails to threaten two other members with whom she most always
disagreed? Remember how the Bersin administration secretly went to
Sacramento and asked for waivers from Title I regulations and state
academic standards while proclaiming to the press and on its website that
they were following and exceeding those very same standards. Remember
how Mr. Bersin and his supporters on the school board and in the press
called those who disagreed with their (now-proven) flawed "Blueprint"
policies anti-Semitic? If people talk and act like a bullies, then . . .
. well, . . . you fill in the blanks.
Now we come to the current situation with Mr. Bersin and his pending
appointment to the State Board of Education (SBE) that was set for
3/29/06, but re-scheduled (by his many rich and powerful friends in
Sacramento) to April 19th due to recent revelations in the San Diego and
Sacramento press about Mr. Bersin and his secret Superintendent's
$524,000 slush fund while employed by SDCS. Mr. Bersin referred to the
slush fund investigation by an independent law firm and the conduct of
the new SDCS school board as "McCarthyism" and a "political
vendetta". Now, further adding to the cacophony, board member Ms.
Nakamura comes galloping to Mr. Bersin's rescue like Joan of Arc saving
Charles VII claiming in her 3/18/06 U-T letter that the investigation and
subsequent board member comments concerning Mr. Bersin's slush fund are
akin to a "Salem Witch Trial". "He has turned over receipts to the
Union-Tribune," she writes as if that publication were an impartial
observer of the whole Bersin State Board of Education nomination process
(seen any recent "Bersin-critical letters to the editor" in the
U-T). Sounds like whining and crying to me. And this isn't the first
time Mr. Bersin has hidden behind Ms. Nakamura's skirts in the face of
criticism of his public policies and deeds.
But Ms. Nakamura is right about one thing: "The more things change, the
more they stay the same," which leads me to explain, in short, why there
is so much grassroots opposition to Mr. Bersin's pending appointment to
the State Board of Education. It's based on his actual record here in San
Diego, not his PR spin. It's because, despite budgeting $350 million for
the "Blueprint For Student Success", the facts are (according to the
California Department of Education and SDCS sources, comparing similar
California school districts) that the Bersin administration produced:
1. Lower API test scores;
2. Lower SAT college entrance test scores;
3. Higher dropout rates;
4. An achievement gap that remained the same or greater for
disadvantaged minorities;
In addition, the Bersin administration did not keep all its Prop MM promises.
And finally, the Governor already has one staff person on the SBE; two is
too many for the best interests of ALL children and their families to be
fairly represented on the California State Board of Education.
Mike MacCarthy is a freelance writer and president of Voters For Truth in
Education, a California nonprofit corporation dedicated "to better
education . . . for all students, regardless of race or national
origin." He can be reached at <mailto:mmwrites@san.rr.com>mmwrites@san.rr.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential,
and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments
thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender immediately.
Dr. Linda M. Nolte, Ph.D.4440d6.jpg
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life!
<http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39174/*http://photomail.mail.yahoo.com>New
PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
Post a Message to ca-resisters:
|