[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
pre-school accountability and DRDP
My colleagues at BEAR work with the CA Dept. of Education on an
excellent early childhood assessment called Desired Results,
Developmental Profile (DRDP).
http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/ci/desiredresults.asp
It incorporates the essential attributes Dr. Meisels highlights in this
chapter. Indeed, his work informed DRDP's creation. It is not high
stakes; it is student-focused, along with parents and teachers, and
should be supported as widely as possible. PJH
http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/ci/desiredresults.asp
George Sheridan wrote:
At 10:38 AM 3/17/2006 -0500, Monty Neill wrote:
Sam Meisels of the Erikson Institute just sent me an email:
In my continuing efforts to bring some sanity to this field, I've
finished another chapter on early childhood accountability. If you'd
like to see it or tell others about it, you can find it on our website:
http://www.erikson.edu/files/nonimages/opmeisels2006.pdf
I have not yet read it.
Meisels is a well-respected scholar and his conclusions will be
important in designing accountability systems for public preschools -
a significant issue if California voters enact the Reiner Initiative
for Universal Preschool this June. The following paragraphs are
excerpted from the Executive Summary.
*
How did a testing approach originally developed for middle-and high-
schoolers come to be applied to very young children? Are the results
of such tests reliable, and if they are, can a narrow range of
information about a single child at a particular time be used to
evaluate teaching or curriculum? In this paper, written as a chapter
in the forthcoming School Readiness, Early Learning, and the
Transition to Kindergarten (R.C.Pianta et al.,Eds.), Samuel J.Meisels
examines the genesis of accountability testing in preschool and
refutes the quality-assurance, production-model assumptions that
underlie its use with young children. Citing the best available
research, he summarizes the arguments against such testing in early
childhood:
· the practical problems of measuring the developmentally
unreliable;
· unintended but real consequences for teaching and learning;
· the failure of such tests to account for tremendous
differences across the preschool population in prior opportunities to
learn;and
· the demonstrably weak association between academic/cognitive
measures in preschool and like measures in first and second grade.
Meisels goes on to examine how each of these facts or circumstances
contributed to the failure of Head Start 's National Reporting System,
one of the largest-scale examples of early childhood accountability
testing to date. Finally, Meisels takes up the question of how to
measure program effectiveness and program quality. He argues for
program evaluation: collecting data on
· structural and dynamic characteristics of programs
(child-staff ratios, staff training, developmentally appropriate
practice, positive interaction between children and staff, parental
involvement,etc.),
· key demographic variables, and finally,
· programs' impact on children.
To measure the latter, Meisels proposes creating an assessment based
on item response theory (IRT), using a metric that describes
children's relative position on a developmental path. Such an
assessment will not only indicate whether children are learning. It
will enable the analysis of program elements, pedagogical techniques,
and child outcomes to determine whether particular aspects of a
program or child and family background are more or less strongly
associated with child outcomes. By learning what works for whom, we
can move beyond simply identifying a particular program 's outcomes to
determining what we can do to help that program --and the young
children it serves --succeed.
Knowledge which is acquired under compulsion has no hold on the mind.
Therefore do not use compulsion, but let early education be rather a
sort of amusement.
- Plato
--
P.J. Hallam, Ph.D., UC Berkeley
Evaluating the Validity of Teacher Licensure Decisions
Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research (BEAR) Center
2000 Center Street #301
Berkeley, CA 94704
(510) 666-9282 (office) -9286 (fax)
Post a Message to ca-resisters: