[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

New Similar Schools Rankings


  • To: Ca-resisters@interversity.org
  • Subject: New Similar Schools Rankings
  • From: George Sheridan <learn@jps.net>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:47:06 -0800

http://www.sacbee.com/content/breakingnews/story/14233097p-15055082c.html
Schools making solid gains, O'Connell says
By Laurel Rosenhall -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 9:06 pm PST Tuesday, March 21, 2006

The state Department of Education released a new analysis Tuesday of last year's test scores that is meant to more accurately compare schools of similar demographics.

As part of California's accountability system, the state annually ranks schools twice on a scale from 1 to 10: The "statewide rank" is based on test performance alone, while the "similar schools rank" compares a school's performance with 100 other campuses considered demographically similar.

The state also released the base Academic Performance Index, which is used to determine how much schools are expected to improve on the standardized tests that students will take in the months ahead.

"These results show that California students are making solid academic gains," state Superintendent Jack O'Connell said during a news conference at O.W. Erlewine Elementary School in Sacramento.

Each spring the state recalibrates schools' API to come up with a new baseline, incorporating more subjects or different standardized tests. And each fall - in the API growth results - the state reports how test scores have changed from the base. This year the base API is the same as the growth API reported in the fall because no new tests have been added to the formula.

The similar-schools ranking, however, is different this year: It includes six new factors, almost doubling the number of variables used to determine which schools are compared with one another.

For the first time, the similar-schools comparison examined how many students are enrolled in gifted programs, have disabilities, are migrants, attend small classes, and have mastered English despite being non-native speakers. It also took into account the grade configuration of schools, such as whether a middle school serves sixth- through eighth-graders or just seventh- and eighth-graders.

Previously, the similar-schools comparison was based on seven factors including student ethnicity and poverty, and the percentage of credentialed teachers.

The new formula led to drastic changes in the rankings of some campuses. At Tahoe Elementary School in Sacramento, Principal Katie Curry was thrilled to learn her similar-schools ranking had jumped to a 7.

"Oh my gosh ... that is great news," she said.

Last year Tahoe Elementary was ranked 1 statewide and 1 among similar schools, meaning its performance was in the bottom 10 percent on both measures. Now it's considered in the top 40 percent among similar schools, though still ranks near the bottom when compared with all schools in the state.

"To know that schools that have the same challenges we do - kids in poverty, English learners, all the things they talk about - to know we were scoring at the 7 place is exciting," Currie said after shouting the new score to her office staff.

The opposite scene was unfolding in the office of Toby Johnson Middle School in Elk Grove. Last year the school ranked 7 among similar campuses; this year 5. But its overall ranking remained high - a 9 - and its API jumped to 823, breaking the state's goal for all schools to reach 800.

"My API went up 25 points and yet my similar-schools ranking went down. I'm scratching my head," said Principal Patrick McDougall. "Within our (new) cluster, we dropped a little bit."

The changes did little to appease opponents of the state API system, who say the data is unhelpful and too complicated.

"If the target keeps shifting each year, how can we know with any certainty which schools are actually improving academic achievement? " Jim Lanich, president of California Business for Education Excellence, asked in a statement.

His group, which represents many of the state's large employers, prefers the federal system for measuring school performance. The system established by the federal No Child Left Behind law looks at the percentage of students scoring at grade level on math and English tests. It does not rank schools against one another or measure changes from one year to the next, as the California system does.

Others were intrigued by the state's new way of measuring similar schools. Mary Perry, deputy director of EdSource, a Palo Alto nonprofit that studies the state's education system, said measuring the challenges that schools face in educating their students is a complicated task.

"There's always a balance to be struck between throwing so many things in that you can't understand it and making sure you have the things in there that in fact lead to fair comparison," Perry said.


Check individual school results: http://sacbee.greatschools.net/cgi-bin/static/api.html


George Sheridan




Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: