[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Sindi Wasserman speaks out


  • To: 2language@yahoogroups.com
  • Subject: Sindi Wasserman speaks out
  • From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:23:06 -0800


Sindi D. Wasserman, Guest Columnist
Bilingual debate is back because students benefit

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

The Daily Bulletin recently published a column by
Peter Schrag, a columnist for the Sacramento Bee. I am
not sure how many people were able to digest it, as
Mr. Schrag deliberately wrote it in very sophisticated
language. However, it was full of misrepresentations
of the truth, and at best it was extremely misleading.
He presented an extremely negative view of the merits
of bilingual education and implied that if the State
Department of Education is to authorize additional
(extremely needed) funding for our state?s EL (English
Learner) students, then we would be, in effect,
segregating these students and be going back to a time
when these students were educationally penalized by a
system of bilingual education.

Scores of research articles have been written and
published that confirm the merits of bilingual
education; meanwhile, since the passage of Proposition
227, a previously bilingual/literate student
population has pitifully become barely monolingual.

Employers advertise more than ever before for
??bilingual preferred? potential employees ­ yet we
are lucky if we can produce high school graduates who
have been able to master even the beginnings of a
second language (thanks to the shortsighted thinking
of our legislators and the public at large.) Of
course, when being bilingual is associated with being
un-American ... what can we expect?

Thankfully, at least one California legislator, Ms.
Jackie Goldberg, D-Los Angeles, is willing to step up
to the plate and fight for California?s immigrant
student population and their parents. If anyone out
there in the reading public would like a more accurate
view of what is happening not only in California, but
in the rest of the country as well, with regard to EL
students, please look up the January publication of
??NEA Today? at www.nea.org. There is an excellent
article about the 425 first languages that the five
million students enrolled in our country's schools
bring to our U.S. classrooms.

We can argue until doomsday whether or not ??these
children should be here.? But the fact is: they are.
It is time for California, at least, to wake up and
smell the roses. These children are here to stay and
are a part of our mainstream society ­ educational and
otherwise.

We must do all we can to educate them properly. This
requires major funding and serious dedication to
obliterating the educational gap that exists between
our students who do not struggle with language
deficits and those who do.

Mr. Schrag seems to know all of the acronyms to throw
around in his column. But I bet he hasn?t visited a
flowering ELD class lately. He might be hard pressed
to find a true bilingual classroom left in California,
thanks to Proposition 227, but the teachers are still
around ­ and we haven?t given up. In the near future,
many educators will travel to Sacramento to let the
State Board of Education know that we demand increased
funding for our EL students.

You are wrong, Mr. Schrag, when you say that ??for
most EL students a generation ago, bilingual education
in California was a dead end that sucked in thousands
of students and kept them there even when they knew
English better than their native language.?

The bilingual programs that were properly funded,
adequately staffed and properly monitored were greatly
successful and have produced some wonderful, fantastic
bilingual and biliterate high school and college
graduates. I know; my students are among them.

Please, public, call to task those who criticize that
which they know little to nothing about. Ask students
who are now able to ??write their ticket? in the job
market because they do speak two languages and have
learned how to navigate in life through two cultures.
They might not be writing editorials to try to sway
your opinions, but they are working in our country?s
hospitals, emergency rooms, law firms, schools, fire
departments, police stations, and are flying our
commercial planes. Look around you. They are
everywhere: These bilinguals, these biliterates, these
??failures.? You bet the debate is back again! And
there are more letters to follow.

- Sindi D. Wasserman is founder and president of Chino
Valley Chapter CABE-California Association for
Bilingual Education.




Post a Message to ca-resisters:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: