[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
A Petition Calling For the Dismantling of the No Child Left Behind Act
- To: ca-resisters@interversity.org
- Subject: A Petition Calling For the Dismantling of the No Child Left Behind Act
- From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 04:52:44 -0800
This petition now has more than 27,000
signatures, and is growing daily. Please consider
signing and joining in the struggle to save our
children. Go to this site to sign and write a comment.
<https://outlook.utpa.edu/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.educatorroundtable.org/>http://www.educatorroundtable.org/
UPDATES: (1) You may not agree with every point
on this document, written trying to take into
consideration as many complaints as possible. If
you agree with one, you should sign, and then
spread the word. (2) Conservatives and Liberals
wrote this legislation; we need both to help us
end it. (3) We are NOT associated with the NEA,
whose leadership has misrepresented our
organization and our movement. In place of NCLB
we offer federally supported, EDUCATOR-led
reform, something NEA leadership should support.
(4) Teachers have written us asking if they can
be fired for signing. This is, the last time we
checked, still the U.S.A., and teachers are
entitled to voice their opinions?just do it from
your home! If you are a teacher, please identify
yourself as such when you sign. (5) Want to do
more than sign a petition? Switch your email
address to ?public? AND WE WILL ADD YOU TO OUR
MAILING LIST, or register at www.educatorroundtable.org.
----------
To: U.S. Congress
We, the educators, parents, and concerned
citizens whose names appear below, reject the
misnamed No Child Left Behind Act and call for
legislators to vote against its reauthorization.
We do so not because we resist accountability,
but because the law's simplistic approach to
education reform wastes student potential,
undermines public education, and threatens the future of our democracy.
Below, briefly stated, are some of the reasons we
consider the law too destructive to salvage. In
its place we call for formal, state-level
dialogues led by working educators rather than by
politicians, ideology-bound "think tank" members,
or leaders of business and industry who have
little or no direct experience in the field of education.
THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT:
1. Misdiagnoses the causes of poor educational
development, blaming teachers and students for
problems over which they have no control.
2. Assumes that competition is the primary
motivator of human behavior and that market
forces can cure all educational ills.
3. Mandates data driven instruction based on
gamesmanship to undermine public confidence in our schools.
4. Uses pseudo science and media manipulation to
justify pro-corporate policies and programs,
including diverting taxes away from communities and into corporate coffers.
5. Ignores the proven inadequacies,
inefficiencies, and problems associated with centralized, "top-down" control.
6. Places control of what is taught in corporate
hands many times removed from students, teachers,
parents, local school boards, and communities.
7. Requires the use of materials and procedures
more likely to produce a passive, compliant
workforce than creative, resilient, inquiring,
critical, compassionate, engaged members of our democracy.
8. Reflects and perpetuates massive distrust of
the skill and professionalism of educators.
9. Allows life-changing, institution-shaping
decisions to hinge on single measures of performance.
10. Emphasizes minimum content standards rather
than maximum development of human potential.
11. Neglects the teaching of higher order
thinking skills which cannot be evaluated by machines.
12. Applies standards to discrete subjects rather
than to larger goals such as insightful children,
vibrant communities, and a healthy democracy.
13. Forces schools to adhere to a testing regime,
with no provision for innovating, adapting to
social change, encouraging creativity, or
respecting student and community individuality, nuance, and difference.
14. Drives art, music, foreign language, career
and technical education, physical education,
geography, history, civics and other non-tested
subjects out of the curriculum, especially in low-income neighborhoods.
15. Produces multiple, unintended consequences
for students, teachers, and communities,
including undermining neighborhood schools and
blurring the line between church and state.
16. Rates and ranks public schools using
procedures that will gradually label them all
"failures," so when they fail to make Adequate
Yearly Progress, as all schools eventually will,
they can be ?saved? by vouchers, charters, or privatization.
While any one of these issues is serious enough
to warrant discarding No Child Left Behind, the
law suffers from all of them. The number of
signatures on this petition should be a clear
indicator to state and national policy makers
that it is time to move beyond this harmful, highly restrictive law.
Sincerely,
<https://outlook.utpa.edu/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.PetitionOnline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?1teacher>The
Undersigned