From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:05:38 AM US/Pacific
To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, arn2-strategy
<arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [arn2-strategy] More on Rising, Bipartisan Pressure to Change
NCLB
Reply-To: arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com
LAWMAKERS EYE CHANGES TO EDUCATION LAW
<>Associated Press -- March 15, 2007
by Nancy Zuckerbrod
President Bush's signature No Child Left Behind education law is headed
for fundamental changes as Congress rewrites it this year, including a
likely softening of do-or-die deadlines.
School administrators long have complained about the annual deadlines,
which punish schools that do not make adequate progress toward having
all children perform at their grade levels.
School officials also have rebelled at requirements that students with
limited English ability or with learning disabilities perform as well
as
their grade-level peers.
Now, those complaints are being taken up by lawmakers spanning the
political spectrum.
Key Democrats who control the federal purse strings are demanding
changes. Moderate Republicans say the law must be more flexible. On
Thursday, they were joined by dozens of GOP conservatives who want an
even more radical overhaul.
Lawmakers say a major flaw is that schools that miss achievement
targets
by a little are treated the same way as schools that miss those goals
by
a lot. Schools then are labeled as needing improvement and face the
same
penalties.
"We can't have one-size-fits-all," Rep. Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich., said
Thursday. He led a group of House and Senate lawmakers in introducing
legislation that would let states opt out of No Child Left Behind
requirements without losing federal education money.
Currently, any state that does not adhere to the requirements of the
$23
billion program cannot get the federal dollars that come with it. The
requirements include annual testing in math and reading in grades three
through eight, and once in high school. The tests must show steady
yearly progress toward a goal of getting students working on grade
level
by the year 2014.
House Republican Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri is supporting the
conservatives' bill, even though he voted for the law in 2001.
"The overriding intrusion in No Child Left Behind is too large to deal
with unless you fundamentally change the legislation," Blunt said.
A former education secretary, GOP Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee,
said, "That's a visceral reaction to too much federal involvement in
local schools."
Alexander is not backing Hoekstra and Blunt in their effort but said
their concerns must be taken into account when the law is rewritten.
Education Secretary Margaret Spellings has testified on Capitol Hill
this week, hearing from Republicans and Democrats who want changes.
Rep. James Walsh, a senior member of the House appropriations
subcommittee that oversees education spending, wants the law loosened
for schools that are failing due to the performance of immigrant
students who do not speak English fluently.
The government exempts students who are just learning English for less
than a year from taking reading tests. After that time, those students
have to be tested and schools are held accountable for their scores.
"We've gotta find a better way to test the progress of these kids,"
said
Walsh, R-N.Y., who expressed the popular view that a year is not long
enough.
When groups of children, such as those learning English or special
education students, fail to meet the law's achievement goals, entire
schools can be labeled as failing and could face consequences such as
having to fire their staffs — which lawmakers say is unfair.
Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn., also on the committee that oversees
education spending, told Spellings she was upset that some states have
lowered the requirements for what students must be able to do on
reading
and math tests to avoid the law's penalties. That creates a situation
where some states look like they are performing well when they may not
be.
"We look like we're doing a poor job when compared to states that set
the bar low," McCollum said.
The issue has led some lawmakers to call for national educational
standards to be included in the law when it is rewritten.
Spellings heard criticism from Wisconsin Democratic Rep. David Obey,
chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, and Iowa Democratic
Sen.
Tom Harkin, who heads the Senate Appropriations subcommittee that
oversees education spending. Both said they were upset about the law's
$1 billion reading program called Reading First.
An Education Department inspector general's investigation found that
people in charge of running the program and reviewing grants had
conflicts of interest and steered money toward certain publishers of
reading curricula.
Spellings expressed concern that the program might be in jeopardy,
saying, "I hope we don't throw the baby out with the bath water."
Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., and Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who
lead
the committees in charge of rewriting the education law, have indicated
they support the reading program but intend to make changes to it.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email
design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/kOt0.A/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/x3XolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arn2-strategy/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arn2-strategy/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:arn2-strategy-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:arn2-strategy-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
arn2-strategy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/