[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
California Dropouts
- To: eninational@lists.riseup.net
- Subject: California Dropouts
- From: George Sheridan <learn@jps.net>
- Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:59:52 -0800
- Cc: ca-resisters@serv1.ncte.org,<ca-resisters@interversity.org>
Editorial: Dropout problem gets some welcome attention
Published Thursday, February 28, 2008 in The Sacramento Bee
Story appeared in EDITORIALS section, Page B6
Incoming Senate President Pro Tem Darrell
Steinberg, D-Sacramento, wants to make
California's high school dropouts his top
legislative priority, even in a tough budget
year. Maybe Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's "Year of
Education" can be rescued after all.
The fact is, too many California ninth-graders
don't make it through high school and graduate
with a diploma. Here's one four-year snapshot:
California had 520,000 ninth-graders in 2002-03,
but only 349,000 actually graduated in 2005-06.
Somewhere along the way, California high schools
lost more than 170,000 students.
What happened to them? California doesn't know.
That has to change. A policy committee of the
California Dropout Research Project, which
includes Steinberg and Sacramento County
Superintendent David Gordon, presented good ideas
Wednesday. (See lmri.ucsb.edu/dropouts.)
In a tight budget year, the main issue will be
getting the information needed to track
graduation rates accurately and improving accountability.
As Steinberg put it, "What doesn't count doesn't matter."
A big problem is that the current system (the
Academic Performance Index) measures only test
scores and not graduation rates. So high schools
have an incentive to push students with lower
test scores into alternative schools. The
original school then has no responsibility for
seeing that these students actually graduate.
Steinberg championed the successful Senate Bill
219, which would include dropout and graduation
rates in the API and assign the test scores of
alternative school students to the original high
school, holding that school accountable no matter
where students are sent. That law takes effect in
2011, when the state's data system is ready.
Now he's pressing Senate Bill 1251, which would
add tracking of five- and six-year graduation
rates to give schools an incentive to help
students earn a diploma. (Some kids, especially
English learners, may take longer than four years to graduate.)
The committee also wants to raise current graduation goals.
Schools are supposed to meet a graduation rate
goal of 82.9 percent ? or show improvement of
one-tenth of a percentage point per year. By that
standard, a school with a graduation rate of 60
percent could take more than 200 years to meet
the state standard. That is unacceptable.
Steinberg has introduced Senate Bill 1532, which
would set more ambitious targets.
While the short-term budget picture is grim, by
2010 the picture for education improves
dramatically. The Proposition 98 constitutional
funding guarantee will enlarge the base for
education by about $5.9 billion in permanent, new
funding. Now is the time to prepare for that infusion.
The committee has many long-term recommendations,
but here's a key one: Put extra effort into
reaching kids in the transition from elementary
to middle school. Attendance, grades and behavior
at that stage are a significant predictor of dropping out.
It's good to see that key players don't intend to
let lean times derail an ambitious "Year of Education."
George Sheridan
Post a Message to ca-resisters: