[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: assessment for vocab acquisition purposes [cross posted]


  • To: middle-lit@interversity.org
  • Subject: Re: assessment for vocab acquisition purposes [cross posted]
  • From: Kruchma@aol.com
  • Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:33:27 EST
  • Cc: rsipe@emich.edu

Pam,

I think you can safely put the lexile scales away, as these do not take into
account student experiences, interests, the genre of the texts, how they
were feeling physically and emotionally that day--and are little more than
syllable counts and high/low usage lists in selected literatures.

One of the best ways to get an estimate of vocabulary knowledge is by using
the CLOZE method, which you may or may not know about. Essentially, select a
passage from either a nonfiction text that your students use of about 100
words, and for every ten leave a blank _________ space for students to predict
(by filling in the blanks) what words might feasibly fit. Usually this
method is suggested for use with fiction, which often has more context and less
content-specific vocabulary, so for this select a passage again of about 100
word but leave blanks _______ after every five words. This works best if
students do not perceive this as an assessment and if they have the excerpted text
in front of them rather than a sheet with blanks with an accompanying answer
sheet. Students will want to know how they fared, so you could have
students share their first few with a partner before you collect these or conduct a
whole-class discussion. You will get the best scores from students who have
experience and/or knowledge of the topic/s of passages used. Take this into
account when planning.

Early on in my career (starting with about the third year) when I was
expected to use a spelling list, I collected vocabulary from peers in science,
math, and ss (in these early years I also was assigned to teach science,
social studies) and chose some of these to include with challenging and/or
significant vocabulary from the resources we were using in our English-Language
blocks. I basically wrote my own spelling book, including the weekly
exercises--these began as traditional vocabulary study and then blossomed into
student-made posters on the wall illustrating the terms in pictures, sentences, etc.
Kind of a pre-cursor to word walls, I guess. And I usually would throw in a
favorite word or two of my own with high use such as posh! Learning words
for a week out of context just does not translate into long-term retention or
even short-term use--and there is a ton of research to support this. That
goes for various assessment lists---these only tell you what a student could
either guess and/or knew at the moment you administered the assessment---and
does not always reflect experience of the word because it is out of context
and is can be related to a topic that is unknown. None of these variables,
as you know, are taken into account with such assessments. There are a
variety of reasons why typical, prescriptive materials do not and should not be
used in teaching and learning. The biggest flaw in my opinion is that these
tend to reinforce your opinions of bright vs. dull students-- unfair and likely
racist.

What you are doing with pulling vocabulary from texts used in class is one
of the best ways to approach vocabulary study, so I encourage you to use that
approach often in lessons as pre-reading and also building use of the
language into lessons---you will be able to evaluate and assess students' knowledge
this way---and if you provide for the use of the chosen vocabulary in
meaningful, highly contextural responses including writing, drama, and group work,
these tasks will give students an opportunity to study these more deeply.
Never present vocabulary in isolation, especially upon first presentation. Use
excepts of text from student work as well as mentor texts---and even your
own! In thirty-five years of teaching and education, I have not found a list
or a prescriptive approach that highly benefits students. I have used some
structure in creating my own formative, evaluative measures with selected
students who may benefit from this for a short amount of time but would monitor
and reflect on its benefits--, and would not impose a structured, prescriptive
approach wholesale, to an entire group.

In general, take a look at a more learner-centered, contextual, inquiry
approach to students' language learning. It not only increases their vocabulary
and spelling, but presents the opportunity to question the text, more
opportunities for multiple use, and this contributes to students feeling of
self-efficacy and thus motivation. It is more your own tweaking strategies you
learn about to fit your own classroom/s that will yield the best information for
you about students and contribute to their highest understandings. The
energy you place into this type of planning for your students is worth it and
highly preferable to the energy and time you would have to exert to FIT a child
into a program or approach that is highly likely to cause unnecessary
stereo-typing and emotional damage.

Here are a few resources you might check out for some ideas:

* Nonfiction Matters: Reading, Writing, & Research in Grades 3-8 (Stephanie
Harvey)--particularly ch. 7
* They Still Can't Specll? Understanding and Supporting Challenged Spellers
in Middle & High School (Rebecca Bowers Sipe)-especially the Appendices,
which are concrete examples of how to reinforce meaningful language, its
spelling, and vocabulary understanding
* Wondrous Words (Katie Wood Ray)
* Words Their Way: Word Sorts for Syllables and Affixes Spellers (Francine
Johnson & colleagues)-the concept presented makes for fun practice of
vocabulary.

Hope some of this helps.
Mary Anna

Mary Anna Kruch, Ph.D.
President-Elect, Michigan Council of Teachers of English
K-12 Writing & Literacy Consultant
Literacy Support Services

kruchma@aol.com

P.O. Box 561
Williamston, MI 48895
517-655-1633
517-256-4045

"If education is to be done expertly, it must be done by the teachers
themselves who as experts use their own knowledge and understandings to define in
particular pedagogic situations the problems that are worth solving and
soluble....education cannot be exercised mechanistically or according to prescribed
programs and algorithms." (p. 33)

Donna H. Kerr in The Ecology of School Renewal, John I. Goodlad, Ed. (1987)



**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489



Post a Message to middle-lit:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: