[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
New Yorker article on wikipedia vs. Britannica (fwd)
- To: engteach-talk@interversity.org, middle-lit@interversity.org
- Subject: New Yorker article on wikipedia vs. Britannica (fwd)
- From: theteach <theteach@theteachonline.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:35:30 -0500 (CDT)
From the techrhet discussion list.
alex
KNOW IT ALL Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
by STACY SCHIFF
Issue of 2006-07-31
Posted 2006-07-24
On March 1st, Wikipedia, the online interactive encyclopedia, hit the
million-articles mark, with an entry on Jordanhill, a railway station in
suburban Glasgow. Its author, Ewan MacDonald, posted a single sentence
about the station at 11 P.M., local time; over the next twenty-four hours,
the entry was edited more than four hundred times, by dozens of people.
(Jordanhill happens to be the "1029th busiest station in the United
Kingdom"; it "no longer has a staffed ticket counter.") The Encyclopędia
Britannica, which for more than two centuries has been considered the gold
standard for reference works, has only a hundred and twenty thousand
entries in its most comprehensive edition. Apparently, no traditional
encyclopedia has ever suspected that someone might wonder about Sudoku or
about prostitution in China.
Rest is at:
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/
Post a Message to middle-lit: