[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

New Yorker article on wikipedia vs. Britannica (fwd)


  • To: engteach-talk@interversity.org, middle-lit@interversity.org
  • Subject: New Yorker article on wikipedia vs. Britannica (fwd)
  • From: theteach <theteach@theteachonline.net>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:35:30 -0500 (CDT)

From the techrhet discussion list.
alex

KNOW IT ALL Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
by STACY SCHIFF
Issue of 2006-07-31
Posted 2006-07-24

On March 1st, Wikipedia, the online interactive encyclopedia, hit the million-articles mark, with an entry on Jordanhill, a railway station in suburban Glasgow. Its author, Ewan MacDonald, posted a single sentence about the station at 11 P.M., local time; over the next twenty-four hours, the entry was edited more than four hundred times, by dozens of people. (Jordanhill happens to be the "1029th busiest station in the United Kingdom"; it "no longer has a staffed ticket counter.") The Encyclopędia Britannica, which for more than two centuries has been considered the gold standard for reference works, has only a hundred and twenty thousand entries in its most comprehensive edition. Apparently, no traditional encyclopedia has ever suspected that someone might wonder about Sudoku or about prostitution in China.

Rest is at: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/



Post a Message to middle-lit:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: